The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Austin Rief no published score: no usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
2exchanges match
0on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered produced feed D 5 · C 5 · P 5 · Cm 4 4.85

Q And Austin, you come aboard, and you're like, hey, you can really do this a lot better, and here's how. So, when did you decide, like, how did you get to the point where the two of you were like, you know what, forget about our jobs, let's just jump into this newsletter thing?

A Yeah, it wasn't an easy decision. So Alex had the job lined up at Morgan Stanley. I was interning at Mollison Company, which is a investment bank in New York City, and very quickly I realized that that wasn't the path for me, and so, you know, we wanted to be entrepreneurs. We had an idea, and so we thought, why not give it a chance, and we saw growth. We saw this grow from Michigan to other Big 10 schools to Ivy League schools to To, I think the big inflection point is when we saw older people reading. We thought this was something for college students, but when we realized this could actually be read by anyone, that was a big moment for us when we thought, wow, this has potential not to be read by tens of thousands, but of millions.

AI assessment note: “the big inflection point is when we saw older people reading.”

Answered produced feed D 5 · C 5 · P 5 · Cm 4 4.85

Q And initially, was it the two of you writing everything in the first year or so?

A You know, very early on, it was just Alex. Then I joined on Uh, and was writing a bit, but one of the big, uh, ideas we had is that we could articulate the tone, and we could talk about the tone and how we wanted to write, and there were times where, you know, we could do it in a sentence or a paragraph, but we knew very early on we couldn't do it consistently day in and day out across a full newsletter, and so we hired people. We hired people who were much more talented than we were, and they wrote the newsletter, and they took that idea in our heads and To create a really great and consistent tone across the full newsletter.

AI assessment note: “very early on, it was just Alex. Then I joined on... so we hired people.”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 800 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.