The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Allison Clements no published score: no usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
0on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered produced feed D 5 · C 5 · P 5 · Cm 5 5.00

Q All right, so excited to talk to you about this letter and notice of proposed rulemaking that Secretary of Energy Wright sent out very recently. Allison, I want to start with you, since you have the procedural knowledge here. Like, technically speaking, what is this? What did Secretary Wright send?

A Technically speaking, what Secretary Wright did was use a provision in the Department of Energy Organizing Act, provision, four or three B, which is why people are referring it to the, as the four or three B letter. He sent a letter to then chairman Rosner at FERC and all of the commissioners and said, I, the secretary of energy direct you to consider issuing an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking or an ANOPER. Around large load interconnections. And it's a fourteen-page kind of bare-bones document that, that in the eyes of the Secretary, constitutes an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking. Um, that's the process, and now FERC can say, okay, great, we're gonna consider it, and they either move forward and issue the advanced notice of proposed rulemaking, which there has been some public indication already that they are eager to do, Or they could decide not to issue the rule, but they would have to justify that decision.

AI assessment note: “Technically speaking, what Secretary Wright did was use a provision in the Department of Energy”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 200 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.