carbon credits

7 statements across 5 episodes · 1 bullish · 4 bearish · 5 people on the record · first statement May 5, 2022 by Ryan Orbuch · across every show →

Everything said about carbon credits, oldest first

May 5, 2022 negative
Opinion
Orbuch: Many low-durability carbon credits represent completely non-existent carbon removals
“Many of the, what we could refer to as low durability, low end credits today, whether it's something like improved forest management or otherwise, it's not that they're low durability, they actually just don't exist. Right? So, like, you have this weird thing …”
Ryan Orbuch May 5, 2022 ▶ 18:53 Growing the Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) market
Jun 23, 2022 positive
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Pierpoint: Carbon credit buyers will increasingly demand permanence and clarity
“I think what's really gonna drive some of the carbon markets in the near term are a lot of the companies that are actually interested in buying credits, and when they do that, they want to see, I think they're increasingly going to want to see some level of pe…”
Lara Pierpoint Jun 23, 2022 ▶ 38:44 Which tech is overhyped, underhyped and just right?
Jun 23, 2022 negative
Insight
Kann: Web3 cannot solve the shortage of high-quality carbon credits
“The actual challenge is A very limited supply of high quality carbon credits or carbon removals and a huge supply of really low quality, really bad carbon credits or offsets. That is the actual problem, and Web three is not really a solution to that.”
Shayle Kann Jun 23, 2022 ▶ 36:50 Which tech is overhyped, underhyped and just right?
Oct 13, 2022 neutral
Assertion Supported
Peterson: Verified carbon credit processes for ocean biomass sinking do not exist yet
“So those are still areas that we don't have all of the data that we would require in order to know those things in order to create you know, verified credits, and so that's why those haven't, those aren't you know, those processes aren't in place yet.”
Alyssa Peterson Oct 13, 2022 ▶ 23:38 What climatetech can learn from the oceans
Jun 8, 2023 negative
Assertion Supported
Sylvera rates under a quarter of carbon credits in top three grades
“We would say of the credits on the market the minority have like a strong environmental integrity. So you'd maybe say around, well actually less than a quarter, we would rate in our top three grades. And now you would have very, very high degree of confidence …”
Alistair Frew (Alistair Fury) Jun 8, 2023 ▶ 11:16 The carbon market’s quality problem
Jun 8, 2023 bearish
Disclosure
Fury: Carbon credit prices were initially inversely correlated with project quality
“In fact, at the beginning, when we first did our first kind of plot of the market price versus the rating, they were inversely correlated. So it's basically like the better the credit, the cheaper it was.”
Alistair Frew (Alistair Fury) Jun 8, 2023 ▶ 22:40 The carbon market’s quality problem
Jan 4, 2024
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Orbuch: High-quality reforestation carbon removal projects cost over $50 per ton
“Good reforestation costs north of 50 dollars a ton, and if your system is set up to tell people that 12 dollars a ton is good, then no one's gonna buy that if you make the 12 dollars a ton thing look the same.”
Ryan Orbuch Jan 4, 2024 ▶ 15:03 Fixing the messy voluntary carbon market
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 200 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.