StarZero All shows Try the podcast clipper →

Erik Brynjolfsson

Director, Stanford Digital Economy Lab · 1 appearance on the record.

computed by AI from the episodes · how this works → · full disclaimer →

academicauthorfounderscientist@erikbryn ↗LinkedIn ↗brynjolfsson.com ↗Wikipedia ↗

He is an economist renowned for research on artificial intelligence economics, IT productivity, and how automation reshapes labor markets and organizational capital. He co-authored bestselling books including The Second Machine Age and co-founded Workhelix, an enterprise AI measurement platform.

9statements → 4claims → 4claims resolved → 75%fully supported → 3.67/5average certainty → 2.78/5average debate potential → ≈4.5/5argument clarity, estimated → 2said about them ↓

3 supported 0 partly supported 1 contradicted how the 4 claims stand · each chip opens the sources

1 prediction · 3 assertions · 3 opinions · 1 insight · 1 what if · every statement was checked. The prediction and assertions are the 4 claims: statements the public record can support or contradict. 4 are resolved. Everything else (opinions, insights, what ifs, disclosures) can never be settled by the record, so it carries no assessment.

The record, in short

What the tape says about how Erik argues and how the claims held up. Everything they said, and everything said about them, is in the tabs below.

Their most notable supported claim

Assertion Supported
AI Cannot Fully Automate Any Single US Occupation, Study Finds
“What we found was that in most jobs, there were some tasks that machine learning could do better than humans, or would be able to if you applied the technology, and there's kind of a gold rush now to do that. But in not a single occupation, we looked at all of…”
Erik Brynjolfsson Jun 4, 2022 ▶ 7:15 Wait, The Robots Didn't Take Our Jobs? — With Erik Brynjolfsson

Their most notable contradicted claim

Prediction Didn’t hold up
Brynjolfsson: Next Tech Wave Will Disproportionately Hit Lower-Skill Jobs
“Our analysis that we did in a follow-up paper with Daniel Rock of Wharton suggests that as with the previous wave, the next wave of technology also will disproportionately affect some of the lower and middle skill jobs compared to the higher skill jobs”
Erik Brynjolfsson Jun 4, 2022 ▶ 13:03 Wait, The Robots Didn't Take Our Jobs? — With Erik Brynjolfsson

Expressed certainty vs assessment result

none yet certainty 1
none yet certainty 2
0% certainty 3
100% certainty 4
none yet certainty 5

weighted support: a fully supported claim counts one, a partly supported claim counts half. Each filled bar is clickable and opens exactly those claims; "none yet" means nothing said at that certainty level has resolved yet

How they sound: not measured why? →

We measure speaking style by listening to the audio itself, and a fair number needs at least 2,000 words from one person on tape we have measured. There is too little of Erik Brynjolfsson on measured tape to publish a rate. This says nothing about how they speak.

Everything Erik Brynjolfsson said on Big Technology that made the record, most notable first. Filter by type, assessment or year in the ledger →

Assertion Supported
AI Cannot Fully Automate Any Single US Occupation, Study Finds
“What we found was that in most jobs, there were some tasks that machine learning could do better than humans, or would be able to if you applied the technology, and there's kind of a gold rush now to do that. But in not a single occupation, we looked at all of…”
Erik Brynjolfsson Jun 4, 2022 ▶ 7:15 Wait, The Robots Didn't Take Our Jobs? — With Erik Brynjolfsson
Prediction Didn’t hold up
Brynjolfsson: Next Tech Wave Will Disproportionately Hit Lower-Skill Jobs
“Our analysis that we did in a follow-up paper with Daniel Rock of Wharton suggests that as with the previous wave, the next wave of technology also will disproportionately affect some of the lower and middle skill jobs compared to the higher skill jobs”
Erik Brynjolfsson Jun 4, 2022 ▶ 13:03 Wait, The Robots Didn't Take Our Jobs? — With Erik Brynjolfsson
Opinion
Society Over-Incentivizes Labor Automation Over Human Augmentation
“In the Turing Trap article, I argue that, as I said earlier, while both of those strategies can in principle be profitable, right now there are excess incentives to focus on substitution and automation, and then not enough to focus on complementing humans.”
Erik Brynjolfsson Jun 4, 2022 ▶ 16:34 Wait, The Robots Didn't Take Our Jobs? — With Erik Brynjolfsson
Opinion
Davos Attendees Genuinely Want to Improve the World, Not Just Hoard Wealth
“I think a big misconception about Davos is is, you know, there's all, The plutocrats and all the wealth and power that's here. But the people who come here they really do seem sincerely interested in changing the world to make it better.”
Erik Brynjolfsson Jun 4, 2022 ▶ 29:26 Wait, The Robots Didn't Take Our Jobs? — With Erik Brynjolfsson
Assertion Supported
AI Can Augment or Replace at Least $1 Trillion of Economic Work
“If you look at the subset of tasks where machine learning can Help or take over for humans or augment humans. It adds up to about a trillion dollars worth of work if you were most conservative.”
Erik Brynjolfsson Jun 4, 2022 ▶ 8:28 Wait, The Robots Didn't Take Our Jobs? — With Erik Brynjolfsson
Insight
AI Depresses Middle-Skill Wages Rather Than Creating Mass Unemployment
“It's taking certain tasks. It's not leading to mass unemployment, but it is shifting the demand for different types of skills, and so there are places where there's less demand and there's more demand, and wages in some areas are depressed when a machine can d…”
Erik Brynjolfsson Jun 4, 2022 ▶ 9:35 Wait, The Robots Didn't Take Our Jobs? — With Erik Brynjolfsson
Opinion
Robotic Process Automation Was Overhyped Because It Merely Automates Existing Tasks
“I think that RPA was a bit overhyped, and so there's a bit of a bubble. There's definitely some value there, but in the end, it's what I said earlier. It's kind of focusing on taking what people are already doing, and automating that often they'll literally, l…”
Erik Brynjolfsson Jun 4, 2022 ▶ 25:33 Wait, The Robots Didn't Take Our Jobs? — With Erik Brynjolfsson
Assertion Supported
Technology Is the Primary Driver of US Wage Structure Shifts
“Of the three, most economists would say that technology's the single biggest one. Larry Katz, who runs the quarterly Journal of Economics and who's, you know, leading labor economist, looked at many of these issues says that it's not even close.”
Erik Brynjolfsson Jun 4, 2022 ▶ 12:04 Wait, The Robots Didn't Take Our Jobs? — With Erik Brynjolfsson
What-if
Amazon Would Not Be a $2 Trillion Company by Merely Automating Cashiers
“If he had been uncreative, he would have walked into a bookstore and said, you know, that cashier, we could automate the cashier. We could put a robot where the cashier is and check people out with a robot cashier. And you know, maybe that would have led to a …”
Erik Brynjolfsson Jun 4, 2022 ▶ 20:45 Wait, The Robots Didn't Take Our Jobs? — With Erik Brynjolfsson

The other half of the tape: Erik Brynjolfsson's own voice is left out of every number here. Other people bring the name up 2 times in 1 episode on Big Technology. every mention, with the transcript →

Who brings them up most Joseph George 2

Every mention by year

tap a year for its mentions
0011212025episodesmentions
0112025episodes it came up in
0010.5212025episodesmentions per episode
2025 2 mentions in 1 episode

Appearances (1)

EpisodeDateSpeaking time
Wait, The Robots Didn't Take Our Jobs? — With Erik Brynjolfsson Jun 4, 2022 23m
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 300 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.

Try the podcast clipper Learn more