Preskill: Superconducting circuits execute gates faster than trapped-ion qubits
John Preskill · John Preskill on Quantum Computing · Y Combinator · May 16, 2018 · at 33:08
Theoretical physicist John Preskill compares the physical performance characteristics of superconducting circuits versus trapped ions.
0:00 / 0:10exact quote · 10.0s
▶ Watch the full episode on YouTube → 720p mp4 · rendered on demand · StarZero watermark
“They have the advantage of being faster than the time to take the cycle time, the time to do a gate is faster than with the trapped ions.”
quote is from the automated transcript, cleaned for reading: filler sounds and stutters are removed, nothing is rephrased. names can be misheard (the analysis reads context, assessments check outside sources). how →
More from John Preskill
Preskill: Validated topological qubit may appear as soon as 2019
“And it's very ambitious, because at this point, it's not even clear they have a single qubit, but if that approach is successful, and we're, it's making progress, so I think we will see a validated Qubit of this type soon, maybe next year.”
Preskill: Superconducting circuits and trapped ions will lead for 5-10 years
“The most advanced are superconducting circuits and trapped ions, which is why I mentioned those first, and I think that will remain true, you know, over the next five to 10 years.”
Preskill: Quantum entanglement is what holds space-time geometry together
“So it's really the entanglement which holds space together, which keeps it from falling apart into little pieces.”
Preskill: Quantum computers will impact chemistry, carbon capture, and materials
“The Ones which will affect everyday life, I think, are better methods for understanding and inventing new materials, new chemical compounds. Things like that can be really important. You know, if you find a better way of capturing carbon by designing a better …”
Preskill: 50-to-100 qubit quantum computers will arrive in a couple years
“We think in a couple of years we'll have devices with about 50 qubits to a hundred, and we'll be able to control them pretty well, and that's an interesting range, because even though it's only 50 to a hundred qubits, doesn't sound like that big a deal, but th…”