The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Geoff Ralston no published score: no usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
0on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered produced feed D 5 · C 5 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.60

Q I was not convinced that this is, that this is going to work given the current strategy. Um, you're not, you shouldn't say, I think, You're a bad founder. Would not say that. Um, but I think there's ways that you can convey that you just were not convinced in an honest way. Because that's basic, if the team cannot convince you, I mean, how do you say this, Jeff?

A Yeah, I think this is, that's actually a great, and one of the hardest questions. We actually struggle this with YC all the time, because sometimes we interview people, and we think it's a great idea, but we just don't believe in the founders. And it's the last thing you want to tell someone. One, because you might be wrong, and you know, you shouldn't stab someone in the heart. Two, because it's not a good interaction, right? And let's just keep in mind though, there are always a million reasons not to invest in a company. Most companies will fail, and it's a lack of your own imagination if you can't come up with a reason why you're not Believing in their version of the future. And that's what you should, that's what you should communicate to them. I, I think the, the bottom line is, every interaction with the founder should be as helpful to the founder as it possibly can be. And if you can't be helpful, then just don't say it. But if you can, if you can find some way to help them, even if the real reason is not that, so much that, but it's still valid, I would use that. There's always something.

AI assessment note: “find some way to help them, even if the real reason is not that”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 300 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.