The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Sze Wong no published score: only 1 usable exchange on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
1on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered raw tape D 5 · C 4 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.30

Q access to its email and somehow it caught the human telling its friends that it was just a bot. And so it sent an email to their boss telling them that they were quitting to get back at them. How can you trust this thing to do anything with any access that you give it? I can't, I'm certainly never going to install it or give it any chance whatsoever.

A I mean, this is, this is very similar to, um, one, one discussion we have with, with, with, with another, another, uh, founder friend where, If you hire an intern, you hire new staff to your company, you're not going to come in and say, look, here's every password, here's everything, here's all the access, here's my key to my house, here's my will, here's where I put my Bitcoin. You're not going to tell them that. You will hire an intern and say, look, I don't know you, your resume set, you're great at whatever, bookkeeping. So here's the book. I won't even give you the entire book, right? This is, this is the invoice of this month. Go put it in, and we'll see how you, how you do work. And if you do that good, then we'll give you more access. That should be how you treat an AI agent. Right now, now, the, the, the great thing about OpenClaw, Is that it, it, it allows you to do that, and therefore there are crazy people who does crazy things, and so to tell the world the possibility, that is the power and the danger, give you all the danger, no, no guardrails, and we can see in the most extreme case how AI agents could work or could destroy, right? Giving, like, like, that's also why the big companies, and actually Entropic has been incrementally trying to do this. Co-work, Entropic co-work is part of that. Like, Quadco, which I love, I use every day, I use three copies of it eve…

AI assessment note: “That should be how you treat an AI agent.”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 300 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.