The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Robert Indries no published score: only 1 usable exchange on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
1on raw tape
1redirected or not addressed
Redirected raw tape D 2 · C 4 · P 3 · Cm 2 2.85

Q of opportunities, uh, for those kinds of acquisitions where they've probably never used AI. They probably don't How to use AI. They probably haven't implemented AI in their business. There's probably a massive opportunity to automate, but at the end of the day, you have to have a human relationship with them to get the deal done. Right. So how, how do we keep MNA human as time goes on?

A Well, um, I think, um, the, the answer might surprise you, but I think that AI will become more human. Because if you look at cars and the way they are designed, they are not designed for optimal efficiency. They are designed for optimal comfort, right? Like you have the pedals where you as a human have legs. They have the gear shift is where you have your right hand, right? Your left hand depends, right? The steering wheel is right here. The, you know, everything is designed for you. And you can look at the chair, look at the table, look at everything that you use is designed for you, the headphones, everything. So we don't design things that are optimal. We design things that are optimal for us from our perspective, right? And so we will Slowly, but surely create AI that is extraordinary for us. So in, you know, give it, you know, 1020 years, whatever, you'll have a robot around your house, you know, that cleans. And feels like they're a human, you know, like Terminator style, like you won't be able to tell, you know, that because you will feel more comfortable. You're not going to look at the, uh, you know, uh, uh, stainless steel metal walking around the house, you know, looking all, uh, incredibly, uh, fierce, you know, and it can kill you in any moment, you know, type of deal. And then they are just picking up, you know, dirt from the ground. Like you're not going to do t…

AI assessment note: “the answer might surprise you, but I think that AI will become more human.”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 300 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.