why aren't all 7 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Assertion Supported
Sever: Predict Leads gave 8% equity for $15K to Startupbootcamp
“We gave eight percent equity for 15 K.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Sever: Every trial user decides to integrate with Predict Leads
“So basically any client that gives us a try, they decide to take a next step and basically integrate with us.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Sever: Predict Leads has zero churn on its data API product
“So for the data part, we have not yet lost a customer. We pivoted a bit. First, we were providing our clients with leads. Now we're just providing them with data. So those clients that we were providing them with leads, those have churned off a bit, but the on…”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Sever: Predict Leads funded 18 months R&D via lifestyle business and grants
“European Union has grants for more innovative companies. We also, our previous startup allows, allows us also to work on, on this one full time. So yeah, with the combination of both, we were able to go basically a year and a half without any money basically.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Sever: Predict Leads has generated around $150,000 in revenue year-to-date
“So basically annual, so till today we've so for We did a 150 K around there.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Sever: Predict Leads checks over 12 million websites for job openings
“We actually check more than twelve million websites and we check their career, career sites, like job opening sites and extract that information.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Sever: Previous lifestyle startup generates around $100k annually
“It's a hundreds of thousands, around a 100,000 per year.”