why aren't all 6 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Lapchick: Shotfarm's average customer pays $1,200 per month
“Our average MRR is 1200 a month.”
Assertion Partly supported
Lapchick: Shotfarm Raised $10M While Competitor Salsify Raised $57M
“So and then, so we raised 10, we got competitors in now at fifty-seven million in funding.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Shotfarm Maintains Negative 0.5% Monthly Net Revenue Churn
“Right now we are at negative half a point.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Shotfarm Has 12,000 Platform Users and Over 100 Paying Customers
“Well, so we have 12,000, we have 12,000 companies using the platform. Not all of them are paying, but more than a hundred are paying.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Lapchick: Shotfarm incurs $20 to $30 annual cost per free user
“My carrying costs for a free customer is about
30 bucks a year, 20 bucks a year, and around there.
maybe even a little bit less, depending on how much storage, free storage they're using, or how much of the free storage they're using.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Lapchick: Shotfarm sales team never targeted 9,000 free platform companies
“So, so the sales team started in 2016 and they, we had so much inbound interest that that's what they sold.
We did, they never even looked at the 9000 companies at the time as an upsell.”