why aren't all 7 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Assertion Supported
Income-generating starter sites sell for 30x to 40x monthly revenue
“For those sites that are earning at least a hundred dollars a month, Then we do, we switch over to a valuation model and look at what is the earnings, which most of these sites are going to sell between 30 and 40 times the monthly revenues.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Human Proof Designs generated $1.5 million in 2019 revenue
“Oh, in 2019, we were at revenue standpoints without some of our bigger sites kind of adjust that is about 1.5 million.”
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Human Proof Designs projects around $2 million in 2020 revenue
“And this year we'll be somewhere around two million.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
SEO and growth services make up 40% of company revenue
“So it's probably about 40% of our revenue now this year.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Human Proof Designs lists a $4K revenue affiliate site for $10K
“If you look right now, we have a niche site in the organic foods market which is really popular nowadays with healthy eating. That site is selling for 10,000. It's a revenue producing site that has made, earned about 4000 dollars in revenue so far this year us…”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Human Proof Designs sold 500 to 600 websites in 2019
“It'd be somewhere in the five, 500 to 600 range.”
Assertion Supported
Empire Flippers mostly lists website deals valued at $100,000 and higher
“If you're going to go to Empire Flippers, you're looking at deals that are 100,000 dollars and up, mostly.”