why aren't all 7 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Gansca: Knotch has had zero churn
“Oh, we have not had any churn.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Gansca: Knotch competitors charge a quarter to half of Knotch's price
“I think if you look at the, I guess, competitive, hashtag competitors, they're not really competitors, but their prices are probably a quarter to half.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Gansca: Knotch enterprise contracts can reach up to $1 million annually
“We have three different buckets. We have a bucket for measuring owned and operated channels that sits between 152 150 K a year. We have a second bucket of measuring paid channels that sits between 203 150 K a year. And then we have an enterprise level deal, wh…”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Gansca: Knotch's average annual contract value is around $300,000
“It's around three under K around, around three under K.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Gansca: Knotch Counts Around 20 Large Paying Enterprise Customers
“So we're at around 20 big paying customers at the moment, and we have a lot more in the pipeline.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Gansca: Knotch Has Tripled Growth Year-Over-Year
“So we've tripled growth year on year.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Gansca met 200 people to get five CMO intros, with only one replying
“I probably met 200 people before I got five introductions. And of those five, only Beth responded.”