Stronach: Permanent tree crops predominantly use revenue sharing leases
Luke Stronach · EP 574: Buying $2m 600 Acre Pecan Farm, $450/acre/mo, Literally Shaking Money From Trees with Investor Luke Stronach · Feb 18, 2017 · at 6:13
Luke Stronach outlines why agricultural investors choose revenue-sharing models over fixed per-acre cash rent for permanent tree crops.
0:00 / 0:13exact quote · 13.7s
720p mp4 · rendered on demand · StarZero watermark
“With other crops that are what we call permanent crops. So these are going to be things during the ground year long, they grow on trees. So these would be almonds. These would be cherries. These would be pecans more frequently. You're going to see that revenue sharing agreement.”
quote is from the automated transcript, cleaned for reading: filler sounds and stutters are removed, nothing is rephrased. names can be misheard (the analysis reads context, assessments check outside sources). how →
More from Luke Stronach
Stronach: Farmland investors are fundamentally water investors
“Most farmland investors beneath the surface, they're water investors. When you go out to the farm, you're looking at the, you know, you're looking at the earth, you're looking at the trees, but what you're really looking for is water.”
Stronach: Permanent Crop Farmland Can Yield Up to 18% Annually
“So you can get that combined yield with permanence up to 16, 17, 18% when things are going really, really, really well with your annual crops, with your things that have to be replanted every year, that's going to be corn, potatoes, onions, your yields are goi…”
Stronach: Farmland's Main Purpose Is Volatility Reduction and Inflation Hedging
“If somebody told me that their main interest in farmland investing was to just make tons of cashflow every year, I would tell them that that is not the main purpose of it. It's main purpose is to reduce the volatility that you see in other investments, like th…”
Stronach: Farmland Returned 500% to 600% During 1970s Inflation
“If you go back to the 19 seventies, if you go back to that, that decade, if you were invested in the stock market, okay, over the decade, you would have gotten, you know, give or take about You know, 16, 17%, but you would have lost so much of your money to in…”