The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Will Shaw no published score: no usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
0on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered produced feed D 5 · C 5 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.60

Q It's 15.2 posts. So, I mean, that's essentially 13 pre, right? Or about 13 next, your, your ARR. I mean, does that feel fair to you, or do you feel like it could have driven it higher or lower? You know, what do you think?

A We could have totally have driven it higher. I mean, the market, you know, better than I do, the market's pretty frothy right now, and we could have driven it higher, but we were really, my biggest problem with fundraising was telling people no, and the reason being is we wanted to be as strategic as possible. We were in a position where we had bootstrapped this. We didn't necessarily have to raise money. The only money worked You know, we're burning some of the original money we put in at this point are saved along the way, and we're using that to drive some marketing. So we really wanted to raise money to start bringing our, our development talent, our, our product team in house, because that's been outsourced previously and to grow our sales and marketing team, uh, and what we're doing there. So we, we wanted to be as strategic as possible. So that meant staying a little bit away from the VCs because we're not going the traditional fundraising route and going more towards angels, which is a little bit different valuation.

AI assessment note: “We could have totally have driven it higher.”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 2,600 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.