The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Suzanne Lauritzen no published score: no usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕

2exchanges match

0on raw tape

0redirected or not addressed

Suzanne Lauritzen ▶ 11:49 · Raffle.ai Raises $3.4m for Customer Support Automation, 7 En… · Nov 3, 2020

Answered produced feed D 5 · C 5 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.60

Q Okay, okay, each to co-founders. And how does that make you feel? Does that feel fair?

A Well, I don't, I, I've actually been thinking about that since you, since your last talk, but I don't, um, I'm not in it for the money in particular. Of course, that's nice and everything, but I'm actually more in it to see a product that I invented on a piece of paper, actually gets live and gets out there. And I think this is amazing because we're going, we're going global with this now, and we have the opportunity to go global because we have venture. So we wouldn't have had that opportunity. The other company I sold was, um, was bootstrapped. So I owned 50% of that with my co-founder. He also owned 50% of that. We were 30 employees when we sold it. We got fifty-fifty each. It was a pure cash sale, and that was beautiful. But, um, but this is just completely different. It took a long time to build that company because it was bootstrapped. So now I wanted to do something, you know, that was venture backed goes quickly. We can go global quickly. And sort of that's, that's just the condition.

AI assessment note: “I'm not in it for the money in particular.”

Suzanne Lauritzen ▶ 9:55 · AI Powered Internal Search Tool Grows 200%, Breaks $1m Run R… · Feb 16, 2022

Answered produced feed D 5 · C 4 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.30

Q Did you have to make any changes to make that happen or no?

A Uh, yes, I think the product has developed so that it's easier to implement, as I said before, so it's also easier to sell, um, because it's a box product. It works off the box, so it works the same day that you actually get it, um, and you don't have to train, um, on the AI anymore, uh, you did before, and, um, and then, I mean, it's just, um, If we are also more mature, we have a bigger brand today. So it's, it's always, you know, as time goes, it will always be easier to sell the product as others have, you know, if your neighbor has it, you want it. So it's, it's, uh, it's basically about that. I think.

AI assessment note: “Uh, yes, I think the product has developed so that it's easier to implement”

The Exchanges

Turn any episode into a week of clips.