The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Ryan Holiday no published score: no usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
2exchanges match
0on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered produced feed D 5 · C 5 · P 5 · Cm 4 4.85

Q Okay. How did you get, I mean, how did you get that?

A Well, I had a track record, right? I'd worked with other authors, I'd built a platform for myself, I had an email list, I had a blog, um, I had good connections, I had good friends, and then I was writing about something that no one had really written about before, and so, you combine those things, someone will pay you to write that book. The book, I was gonna go into a, in an auction or a bidding war, Penguin, which is the publisher I've worked with ever since, uh, preempted it in a, in a pretty big, Way. And then the first thing I did was I took that, and I put out a press release that said I'd sold it for a half a million dollars, because I wanted to illustrate how, like, people just trust whatever is in a press release. So then that came out, and so the book was a, the book was much more controversial than, let's say, its sales would have represented, but it did really good, and it afforded me the opportunity to do a second book.

AI assessment note: “Well, I had a track record, right? I'd worked with other authors”

Answered produced feed D 5 · C 5 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.60

Q So it was less for obstacles away, like fifty-ish?

A A little bit more than that. I knew that, I knew it had the potential to be my biggest book. I knew that working with a traditional publisher at my age, I needed to write a book about philosophy, and I knew it needed the distribution and credibility that I wanted. And because I, I'm not financially independent, but I have a, I have my business that pays my bills. So I didn't need the money to live, so as long as it was more than one dollar, I was willing to So that book came out now two years ago, and it's, it's sold like crazy, it's used in the NFL, it's used in college sports, it's used in the military, it, it, it's become this sort of runaway cult sensation, which I had some inkling it had the potential to do, but I had no idea that it, and certainly my publisher, I had no idea that it would become sort of what it's become.

AI assessment note: “A little bit more than that.”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 2,600 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.