Q cap table. And generally speaking, the more people you have listed on your cap table, The higher risk in the future that one of them sues if you have a big exit, right? For some made up thing, just cause they want money. Uh, Ron, how does the system start engine as a system? How is, how illegally, how do, how is that risk, uh, limited for future potential investors?
A Well, first is through the disclosures and the subscription agreement that each investor signs, so there's going to be, um, an understanding, a mutual understanding, that's evidenced by the actual subscription agreement, which is gonna limit the rights of both the investor and the company, uh, relative to each other. The second thing is disclosure, as Chad pointed out, the third thing is, is that, you know, I, I, I think to be honest with you here, Nathan, I, I think there's an inversion of risk, and here's what it is, if you have Other sophisticated venture capital, super angels, high net worth individuals in your round, and something along the lines of what you described occurs, where there's an exit, but for some reason, some folks feel that they're entitled to more. People that have hundreds of thousands or millions into these deals have a substantial stake to motivate them to bring those kinds of cases, and in addition, they have access to the legal counsel, um, that would be able to perhaps even take that That kind of stuff on contingency. Whereas if you take the average person who might've invested five or 600 dollars in an opportunity, if it didn't work out, or if others ended up walking away with materially more, so meaning that, well, I thought I'm really entitled to double my money. I should've gotten a thousand dollars back, but instead I only got 650 or 750. I thin…
AI assessment note: “first is through the disclosures and the subscription agreement that each investor signs”