The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Jan Arendtsz no published score: no usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
0on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered produced feed D 5 · C 4 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.30

Q these headlines of a 5.7 billion valuation, but they only have got, you know, 150, hundred and seventy million bucks of ARR, so the multiple there also just feels like, how do they go into that valuation? Obviously, Zapier, bootstrap, different story. Do you have a backstory? Were you a founder in the past that got burned on too high a valuation? Why do you have so much discipline here?

A Short answer is no. I'm a first time founder, and like you, you look at what's in front of you, right? Where you are, where you're trying to head, why you're raising money, how much you want to raise at that particular time, and what is the right multiple at that time. I think the, By the way, it was not a four X, it was almost a five X in our series A round. At that time, we were unproven because we were building a new product, didn't have it in market yet, and it was a risk for our series A investor to come in and, ah, invest in a company that still didn't have the, the future product of the company. So, so that's why in the end we, we ended up at, at that multiple. But in our series B round, series C round, right, there were other extenuating factors. I think every, every round was different.

AI assessment note: “Short answer is no. I'm a first time founder”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 2,600 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.