The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Heiko Schwarz no published score: no usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
0on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered produced feed D 5 · C 5 · P 5 · Cm 4 4.85

Q Put all, this is an interesting space. Put all this on a timeline for me. What year did you launch the company in?

A Um, so, we founded Risk Methods back in 2000, uh, 13, started with a, uh, development of the technology, went to the market end of 2013, and, um, We, this time we focused mainly on the part where we automatically identify the threats, um, into the supply networks of companies, and this part of our offering is called risk radar because we monitor the threats. Um, then, um, we released the impact assessment part, which is bringing in a second dimension to build risk portfolios. Think about threats on one axis and the impact on another axis, which, um, supports organizations to prioritize and where, and, and to, to give them a guidance where to put a focus in terms of resources, capacity, money, um, cost, basically budgets, to improve the risk exposure. And last but not least, to close the loop, all the action planning and execution support to track down the progress of the preventive activities, but also on the crisis reactive part of what is risk management, basically. Right.

AI assessment note: “we founded Risk Methods back in 2000, uh, 13”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 2,600 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.