The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Florian Hill no published score: no usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
0on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered produced feed D 4 · C 4 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.00

Q patient in that dentist chair, right? And if they use Vidya and Vidya helps them upsell better, every DSO is going to fall in love with you. In fact, they love you more if you help them upsell more. So aren't you very incentivized to make sure the dentist can upsell something to the client in the seat? And if so, isn't that not a great experience for the patient?

A Um, so I, I get your point, but that's actually, it's not what we are seeing in the market, really. The problem is more That, um, that dentists, especially younger dentists, which are primarily going to the DSO. So they have, they just got off dentists who will have a lot of that. So they go to these dental chains, right? Because they cannot afford to get their own practice. And they actually very insecure at this point to really do the right diagnosis. So what they are doing is actually over diagnosing. And what I mean by this is they are, you, you and Nathan and maybe have five cavities that say, and you need like five fillings. Um, they maybe showed you just two and three are skipped. That's literally what we have in the statistics, right? And so those three cavities, they come back and hunt you down the line, but then they are not any more cost effective fillings and small procedures, but then they might become crowns. So what we really try to do is not to, we don't give a treatment recommendation for this, uh, over treatments of more classified as like for this diagnosis, the cavity can do a crown or filling that is in the hands of the dentist, but we want to make sure that they don't miss anything where you could do earlier on a less invasive procedure. Does that make sense?

AI assessment note: “we want to make sure that they don't miss anything where you could do earlier”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 2,600 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.