The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Chris Ultian no published score: no usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
2exchanges match
0on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered produced feed D 5 · C 5 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.60

Q I see. Sport trade, FanDuel, DraftKings. You didn't say them, but I did. I think, I think we get it. So Wendy, give me the backstory here. What are some of these companies paying you per month on average to, to use this technology?

A So the way that this industry works, uh, them and their vendors, because in order to sell to those companies or give them like, you know, if you're, let's, I'm going to use FanDuel as an example randomly for no particular reason. Uh, if you are a person who is sending traffic to FanDuel and FanDuel will pay you for that traffic, you have that affiliate relationship. In order to do that, you must get licensed very specifically. Those licenses tend to be one or two year deals depending on the state, and every state also has a different kind of way that you get licensed. So we sell those kind of on an annualized basis, uh, 7000 dollars a year is currently our beta pricing for it, and companies that want to work with these sportsbooks pay us that, and that's the annual fee. The sportsbooks themselves, we have a slightly different model on that. There is an annualized fee for the platform, Uh, and then we actually have a per license fee. So you have one person who needs to get licensed in three jurisdictions. We charge you a flat fee for each of those.

AI assessment note: “7000 dollars a year is currently our beta pricing for it”

Answered produced feed D 5 · C 5 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.60

Q Did you guys split equity at the beginning, a third each?

A Uh, no. When we started this way back when, uh, it was on an idea that I had, I had brought in the initial capital, uh, and pretty much took no salary in order to make things work, uh, while we had a consulting gig that kept the doors open and the lights on, and was able to divert a lot of that to my, uh, technical co-founder at the time. So in exchange for that, I took the lion's share of equity as, uh, The labor of his, uh, various different projects really fueled the company forward. We were able to balance that out a little bit more, but some of the later co-founders who came in kind of after we had a more established idea of what was going on did not get a substantial equity.

AI assessment note: “Uh, no. When we started this way back when, uh, it was”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 2,600 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.