Oct 15, 2018 · 22m · top-founders

1178 How QASymphony Used Integrations to Drive 115% Gross Revenue Retention, $20m in ARR

David Keil · 12m spoken Nathan Latka · 7m spoken
0:00 / 0:00

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

Host Nathan Latka interviews QA Symphony CEO David Keil, exploring how the SaaS enterprise testing platform scaled from $500,000 to $20 million in ARR with a 115% gross revenue retention rate, deep Jira integration, and $47.5 million in venture funding.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Nathan holds 37.7% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

Nathan as informed peer 6.0 Guest teaching 2.8 Guest disagreement 1.5 Nathan pushing back 2.7
05100:0010:0020:001:35–6:29 · Nathan as informed peer 6/10 Executive Background and Shift to QA Testing Nathan quickly translates annual run rate figures into monthly revenue and verifies whether the $20M ARR is trailing or current run rate. David cooperatively breaks down the pricing structure and logo metrics.6:29–8:55 · Nathan as informed peer 5/10 Origins in Vietnam and $47.5M Venture Funding Nathan calculates total venture capital raised ($47.5M) and inquires if David came in through an EIR role. David clarifies his executive recruitment background and the company's origin in Vietnam.8:55–11:49 · Nathan as informed peer 6/10 Moving Upmarket and Strategic Jira Integration Nathan presses on the operational friction of moving upmarket and how existing legacy low-ACV customers were handled. David outlines how deep Jira integration and enterprise scalability drove the gradual ASP increase.11:52–13:53 · Nathan as informed peer 6/10 Enterprise Sales Engine and Inbound Lead Generation Nathan probes whether Jira serves as an App Store lead generator. David clarifies that Jira is a product differentiator while 80% of sales pipeline is generated through their own inbound marketing engine.13:53–17:28 · Nathan as informed peer 7/10 Global Team Distribution, CAC Payback, and 115% Retention When David refuses to disclose fully weighted CAC, Nathan pivots the question into target payback periods to pin down the estimated 12 to 18-month range. They also parse the difference between gross churn and net revenue retention.17:28–21:05 · Nathan as informed peer 6/10 Market Dynamics, Micro Focus Disruption, and Customer LTV Nathan quizzes David on competitors like HPE/Micro Focus, Sauce Labs, and Rainforest QA before calculating lifetime customer value based on multi-year retention. David shares competitive displacement dynamics and finishes the standard rapid-fire questions.1:35–6:29 · Guest teaching 2/10 Executive Background and Shift to QA Testing Nathan quickly translates annual run rate figures into monthly revenue and verifies whether the $20M ARR is trailing or current run rate. David cooperatively breaks down the pricing structure and logo metrics.6:29–8:55 · Guest teaching 2/10 Origins in Vietnam and $47.5M Venture Funding Nathan calculates total venture capital raised ($47.5M) and inquires if David came in through an EIR role. David clarifies his executive recruitment background and the company's origin in Vietnam.8:55–11:49 · Guest teaching 3/10 Moving Upmarket and Strategic Jira Integration Nathan presses on the operational friction of moving upmarket and how existing legacy low-ACV customers were handled. David outlines how deep Jira integration and enterprise scalability drove the gradual ASP increase.11:52–13:53 · Guest teaching 3/10 Enterprise Sales Engine and Inbound Lead Generation Nathan probes whether Jira serves as an App Store lead generator. David clarifies that Jira is a product differentiator while 80% of sales pipeline is generated through their own inbound marketing engine.13:53–17:28 · Guest teaching 4/10 Global Team Distribution, CAC Payback, and 115% Retention When David refuses to disclose fully weighted CAC, Nathan pivots the question into target payback periods to pin down the estimated 12 to 18-month range. They also parse the difference between gross churn and net revenue retention.17:28–21:05 · Guest teaching 3/10 Market Dynamics, Micro Focus Disruption, and Customer LTV Nathan quizzes David on competitors like HPE/Micro Focus, Sauce Labs, and Rainforest QA before calculating lifetime customer value based on multi-year retention. David shares competitive displacement dynamics and finishes the standard rapid-fire questions.1:35–6:29 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Executive Background and Shift to QA Testing Nathan quickly translates annual run rate figures into monthly revenue and verifies whether the $20M ARR is trailing or current run rate. David cooperatively breaks down the pricing structure and logo metrics.6:29–8:55 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Origins in Vietnam and $47.5M Venture Funding Nathan calculates total venture capital raised ($47.5M) and inquires if David came in through an EIR role. David clarifies his executive recruitment background and the company's origin in Vietnam.8:55–11:49 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Moving Upmarket and Strategic Jira Integration Nathan presses on the operational friction of moving upmarket and how existing legacy low-ACV customers were handled. David outlines how deep Jira integration and enterprise scalability drove the gradual ASP increase.11:52–13:53 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Enterprise Sales Engine and Inbound Lead Generation Nathan probes whether Jira serves as an App Store lead generator. David clarifies that Jira is a product differentiator while 80% of sales pipeline is generated through their own inbound marketing engine.13:53–17:28 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Global Team Distribution, CAC Payback, and 115% Retention When David refuses to disclose fully weighted CAC, Nathan pivots the question into target payback periods to pin down the estimated 12 to 18-month range. They also parse the difference between gross churn and net revenue retention.17:28–21:05 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Market Dynamics, Micro Focus Disruption, and Customer LTV Nathan quizzes David on competitors like HPE/Micro Focus, Sauce Labs, and Rainforest QA before calculating lifetime customer value based on multi-year retention. David shares competitive displacement dynamics and finishes the standard rapid-fire questions.1:35–6:29 · Nathan pushing back 2/10 Executive Background and Shift to QA Testing Nathan quickly translates annual run rate figures into monthly revenue and verifies whether the $20M ARR is trailing or current run rate. David cooperatively breaks down the pricing structure and logo metrics.6:29–8:55 · Nathan pushing back 1/10 Origins in Vietnam and $47.5M Venture Funding Nathan calculates total venture capital raised ($47.5M) and inquires if David came in through an EIR role. David clarifies his executive recruitment background and the company's origin in Vietnam.8:55–11:49 · Nathan pushing back 2/10 Moving Upmarket and Strategic Jira Integration Nathan presses on the operational friction of moving upmarket and how existing legacy low-ACV customers were handled. David outlines how deep Jira integration and enterprise scalability drove the gradual ASP increase.11:52–13:53 · Nathan pushing back 3/10 Enterprise Sales Engine and Inbound Lead Generation Nathan probes whether Jira serves as an App Store lead generator. David clarifies that Jira is a product differentiator while 80% of sales pipeline is generated through their own inbound marketing engine.13:53–17:28 · Nathan pushing back 6/10 Global Team Distribution, CAC Payback, and 115% Retention When David refuses to disclose fully weighted CAC, Nathan pivots the question into target payback periods to pin down the estimated 12 to 18-month range. They also parse the difference between gross churn and net revenue retention.17:28–21:05 · Nathan pushing back 2/10 Market Dynamics, Micro Focus Disruption, and Customer LTV Nathan quizzes David on competitors like HPE/Micro Focus, Sauce Labs, and Rainforest QA before calculating lifetime customer value based on multi-year retention. David shares competitive displacement dynamics and finishes the standard rapid-fire questions.

speaking balance: gold is Nathan, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · Nathan 66.8% · guest 33.2%0:00 · Nathan 66.8% · guest 33.2%3:00 · Nathan 18.7% · guest 81.3%3:00 · Nathan 18.7% · guest 81.3%6:00 · Nathan 16.8% · guest 83.2%6:00 · Nathan 16.8% · guest 83.2%9:00 · Nathan 60.6% · guest 39.4%9:00 · Nathan 60.6% · guest 39.4%12:00 · Nathan 25.8% · guest 74.2%12:00 · Nathan 25.8% · guest 74.2%15:00 · Nathan 33.8% · guest 66.2%15:00 · Nathan 33.8% · guest 66.2%18:00 · Nathan 23.5% · guest 76.5%18:00 · Nathan 23.5% · guest 76.5%21:00 · Nathan 86.8% · guest 13.2%21:00 · Nathan 86.8% · guest 13.2%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 14:31 David shuts down proprietary CAC breakdown

David explicitly declines to share fully weighted customer acquisition costs, citing confidentiality while defending their top-quartile efficiency.

Hardest push from Nathan ▶ 14:54 Nathan redirects after CAC deflection

Rather than accepting the guest's refusal to discuss CAC, Nathan immediately reframes the inquiry around acceptable CAC payback windows to deduce the underlying unit economics.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 16:50 David clarifies gross retention and net expansion math

David educates the host on how their 10-15% revenue churn combined with 25-30% expansion produces their 115% net revenue retention figure.

Nathan holds their own ▶ 15:19 Nathan deduces acquisition spending economics

Nathan demonstrates strong SaaS domain knowledge by locking in an estimated 12-18 month payback period and correlating first-year ACV directly to acquisition budget thresholds.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicNathan as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementNathan pushing backWhy
Executive Background and Shift to QA Testing 6212 Nathan quickly translates annual run rate figures into monthly revenue and verifies whether the $20M ARR is trailing or current run rate. David cooperatively breaks down the pricing structure and logo metrics.
Origins in Vietnam and $47.5M Venture Funding 5211 Nathan calculates total venture capital raised ($47.5M) and inquires if David came in through an EIR role. David clarifies his executive recruitment background and the company's origin in Vietnam.
Moving Upmarket and Strategic Jira Integration 6312 Nathan presses on the operational friction of moving upmarket and how existing legacy low-ACV customers were handled. David outlines how deep Jira integration and enterprise scalability drove the gradual ASP increase.
Enterprise Sales Engine and Inbound Lead Generation 6323 Nathan probes whether Jira serves as an App Store lead generator. David clarifies that Jira is a product differentiator while 80% of sales pipeline is generated through their own inbound marketing engine.
Global Team Distribution, CAC Payback, and 115% Retention 7436 When David refuses to disclose fully weighted CAC, Nathan pivots the question into target payback periods to pin down the estimated 12 to 18-month range. They also parse the difference between gross churn and net revenue retention.
Market Dynamics, Micro Focus Disruption, and Customer LTV 6312 Nathan quizzes David on competitors like HPE/Micro Focus, Sauce Labs, and Rainforest QA before calculating lifetime customer value based on multi-year retention. David shares competitive displacement dynamics and finishes the standard rapid-fire questions.

Statements from this episode (13)

Assertion Not checkable as stated
QA Symphony Scaled to $20M ARR Run Rate in Under Four Years
“We've grown essentially from zero to twenty million in less than four years. It's a hundred percent of a recurring business model.”
David Keil Oct 15, 2018 ▶ 3:28
Assertion Not checkable as stated
QA Symphony Lists Software at $1,000 Per User With $50K Average ACV
“Our software list price is approximately a thousand dollars per user per year. So a, we have many clients who are in that 20 to 30,000 starting point range per year. At the same time, we work with large enterprises that are paying us, you know, two, 304 100,00…”
David Keil Oct 15, 2018 ▶ 4:55
Assertion Not checkable as stated
QA Symphony Serves 570 Enterprise Customers
“Yeah, we have 570 customers today with, you know, thousands and thousands of users.”
David Keil Oct 15, 2018 ▶ 5:19
Assertion Partly supported
Keil: QA Symphony spun out from KMS with 30 developers in 2011
“So they had the idea to build out the next generation agile testing platform back in 2011 and started the business by taking 30 of their developers from the services business called KMS and starting QA Symphony in a separate building.”
David Keil Oct 15, 2018 ▶ 6:52
Disclosure
Keil: QA Symphony raised $47.5M across three funding rounds
“The first round was a two and a half million dollar raise in, in 2015. We raised five million in our series B in early 2016. And then we did a much bigger raise in early 2017 with insight ventures where we raised forty million.”
David Keil Oct 15, 2018 ▶ 7:38
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Keil: QA Symphony increased ASP every quarter for four years
“Each and every quarter have seen a nice uptick in our ASP.”
David Keil Oct 15, 2018 ▶ 9:38
Assertion Supported
Keil: QASymphony secured early enterprise wins including Nordstrom, Barclays, and Amazon
“We started to get some early wins with companies like Nordstrom and companies like Barclays and companies in the e-commerce space like Amazon.”
David Keil Oct 15, 2018 ▶ 12:42
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Keil: QASymphony generates nearly 80% of its business through inbound leads
“We're getting nearly 80% of our business through inbound leads.”
David Keil Oct 15, 2018 ▶ 13:36
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Keil: QASymphony has around 130 employees across Atlanta, Vietnam, and London
“So we've got overall about 130 employees. We've got 40 in Vietnam. We've got about 85 here in Atlanta, and we've got a small but growing team in London of sales executives focused in the Europe market.”
David Keil Oct 15, 2018 ▶ 13:56
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Keil: QASymphony will be cashflow positive later in 2018
“And we'll, we'll be cashflow positive later this year.”
David Keil Oct 15, 2018 ▶ 14:41
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Keil: QASymphony sees 85% to 90% gross retention plus 25% to 30% expansion
“That's gross. And so we would generally see about 85 to 90% retention in a given year. And then we would add 25 to 30% of additional revenue from that current customer to get to that one 15 metric I spoke about.”
David Keil Oct 15, 2018 ▶ 16:52
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Keil: Software testing is a $40B market, QASymphony targets $3B-$4B
“The market is about a forty billion dollar market. We're targeting a slice of that today in the three to four billion range, but it's a huge market and plenty of room for folks like sauce and others to do well in.”
David Keil Oct 15, 2018 ▶ 18:33
Disclosure
QASymphony Customer LTV Exceeds $150,000 Driven by $50,000 New ACV
“Our average customer today, our new average customer is about 50,000, but our historical average, really, if you look at the entire life cycle is closer to 30,000. And, you know, since we're able to keep these customers on average for, you know, six plus years…”
David Keil Oct 15, 2018 ▶ 18:52
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 2,600 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.