Mar 3, 2025 · 30m · the-pitch

#44 Is This Sports App the Next OpenTable?

Topias Soininen · 10m spoken Josh Muccio · 6m spoken Michael Hyatt · 3m spoken Jillian Manus · 2m spoken Howie Diamond · 2m spoken Phil Nadel · 56s spoken
0:00 / 0:00
▶ Watch on YouTube →

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

Finnish founder Topias Soininen pitches Playven, a recreational tennis booking and club management platform, seeking a two-million-dollar investment on The Pitch. The investor panel ultimately passes on the deal due to concerns over an unjustified eight-million-dollar valuation, minimal revenue, and strategic confusion between its B2B SaaS and B2C marketplace models.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Josh holds 26.9% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

Josh as informed peer 6.5 Guest teaching 3.3 Guest disagreement 4.8 Josh pushing back 6.8
05100:0010:0020:0030:001:20–3:27 · Josh as informed peer 5/10 The Tennis Problem and Initial Valuation Pushback Topias introduces Playven and asks for $2 million at an $8 million valuation. Jillian immediately questions the high valuation and asks for unit economics, prompting Topias to deflect by offering an app demo.3:28–8:53 · Josh as informed peer 6/10 Marketplace Demonstration and Revenue Discrepancies Investors drill into Topias's numbers after he demonstrates the app, uncovering that despite 200,000 bookings, monthly revenue is only $2,000 because most bookings are free in Finland. Michael and Howie push back on the lack of growth over two years.8:54–12:00 · Josh as informed peer 7/10 The SaaS Discovery and Unit Economics Debate The investors discover Playven is also a SaaS backend for clubs, generating most of its revenue from only 24 paying facilities. Michael questions the slim margins and high CAC, but Topias forcefully disagrees, arguing that 10% is sufficient due to high organic player retention.12:01–16:20 · Josh as informed peer 8/10 Valuation Scrutiny and Phil Nadel's Pass Topias reveals he raised at a $4M valuation just months earlier in April, prompting Michael and Jillian to reject his justification for doubling it to $8M. Phil Nadel passes abruptly due to lack of urgency and low revenue.16:41–20:43 · Josh as informed peer 7/10 Final Investor Rejections and Pitch Departure Phil and Michael challenge the low SaaS pricing for an allegedly mission-critical tool. All remaining investors pass sequentially, with Jillian citing the push-me-pull-you dynamic of trying to be both a SaaS platform and a consumer marketplace.20:46–28:32 · Josh as informed peer 6/10 Investor Post-Mortem on Focus and Valuation The investors hold a post-mortem debating Playven's addressable market and dual identity. Josh follows up with Topias, who explains why expanding from Finland to the U.S. was essential for raising venture capital.1:20–3:27 · Guest teaching 2/10 The Tennis Problem and Initial Valuation Pushback Topias introduces Playven and asks for $2 million at an $8 million valuation. Jillian immediately questions the high valuation and asks for unit economics, prompting Topias to deflect by offering an app demo.3:28–8:53 · Guest teaching 4/10 Marketplace Demonstration and Revenue Discrepancies Investors drill into Topias's numbers after he demonstrates the app, uncovering that despite 200,000 bookings, monthly revenue is only $2,000 because most bookings are free in Finland. Michael and Howie push back on the lack of growth over two years.8:54–12:00 · Guest teaching 5/10 The SaaS Discovery and Unit Economics Debate The investors discover Playven is also a SaaS backend for clubs, generating most of its revenue from only 24 paying facilities. Michael questions the slim margins and high CAC, but Topias forcefully disagrees, arguing that 10% is sufficient due to high organic player retention.12:01–16:20 · Guest teaching 3/10 Valuation Scrutiny and Phil Nadel's Pass Topias reveals he raised at a $4M valuation just months earlier in April, prompting Michael and Jillian to reject his justification for doubling it to $8M. Phil Nadel passes abruptly due to lack of urgency and low revenue.16:41–20:43 · Guest teaching 2/10 Final Investor Rejections and Pitch Departure Phil and Michael challenge the low SaaS pricing for an allegedly mission-critical tool. All remaining investors pass sequentially, with Jillian citing the push-me-pull-you dynamic of trying to be both a SaaS platform and a consumer marketplace.20:46–28:32 · Guest teaching 4/10 Investor Post-Mortem on Focus and Valuation The investors hold a post-mortem debating Playven's addressable market and dual identity. Josh follows up with Topias, who explains why expanding from Finland to the U.S. was essential for raising venture capital.1:20–3:27 · Guest disagreement 3/10 The Tennis Problem and Initial Valuation Pushback Topias introduces Playven and asks for $2 million at an $8 million valuation. Jillian immediately questions the high valuation and asks for unit economics, prompting Topias to deflect by offering an app demo.3:28–8:53 · Guest disagreement 4/10 Marketplace Demonstration and Revenue Discrepancies Investors drill into Topias's numbers after he demonstrates the app, uncovering that despite 200,000 bookings, monthly revenue is only $2,000 because most bookings are free in Finland. Michael and Howie push back on the lack of growth over two years.8:54–12:00 · Guest disagreement 7/10 The SaaS Discovery and Unit Economics Debate The investors discover Playven is also a SaaS backend for clubs, generating most of its revenue from only 24 paying facilities. Michael questions the slim margins and high CAC, but Topias forcefully disagrees, arguing that 10% is sufficient due to high organic player retention.12:01–16:20 · Guest disagreement 6/10 Valuation Scrutiny and Phil Nadel's Pass Topias reveals he raised at a $4M valuation just months earlier in April, prompting Michael and Jillian to reject his justification for doubling it to $8M. Phil Nadel passes abruptly due to lack of urgency and low revenue.16:41–20:43 · Guest disagreement 5/10 Final Investor Rejections and Pitch Departure Phil and Michael challenge the low SaaS pricing for an allegedly mission-critical tool. All remaining investors pass sequentially, with Jillian citing the push-me-pull-you dynamic of trying to be both a SaaS platform and a consumer marketplace.20:46–28:32 · Guest disagreement 4/10 Investor Post-Mortem on Focus and Valuation The investors hold a post-mortem debating Playven's addressable market and dual identity. Josh follows up with Topias, who explains why expanding from Finland to the U.S. was essential for raising venture capital.1:20–3:27 · Josh pushing back 6/10 The Tennis Problem and Initial Valuation Pushback Topias introduces Playven and asks for $2 million at an $8 million valuation. Jillian immediately questions the high valuation and asks for unit economics, prompting Topias to deflect by offering an app demo.3:28–8:53 · Josh pushing back 7/10 Marketplace Demonstration and Revenue Discrepancies Investors drill into Topias's numbers after he demonstrates the app, uncovering that despite 200,000 bookings, monthly revenue is only $2,000 because most bookings are free in Finland. Michael and Howie push back on the lack of growth over two years.8:54–12:00 · Josh pushing back 7/10 The SaaS Discovery and Unit Economics Debate The investors discover Playven is also a SaaS backend for clubs, generating most of its revenue from only 24 paying facilities. Michael questions the slim margins and high CAC, but Topias forcefully disagrees, arguing that 10% is sufficient due to high organic player retention.12:01–16:20 · Josh pushing back 8/10 Valuation Scrutiny and Phil Nadel's Pass Topias reveals he raised at a $4M valuation just months earlier in April, prompting Michael and Jillian to reject his justification for doubling it to $8M. Phil Nadel passes abruptly due to lack of urgency and low revenue.16:41–20:43 · Josh pushing back 8/10 Final Investor Rejections and Pitch Departure Phil and Michael challenge the low SaaS pricing for an allegedly mission-critical tool. All remaining investors pass sequentially, with Jillian citing the push-me-pull-you dynamic of trying to be both a SaaS platform and a consumer marketplace.20:46–28:32 · Josh pushing back 5/10 Investor Post-Mortem on Focus and Valuation The investors hold a post-mortem debating Playven's addressable market and dual identity. Josh follows up with Topias, who explains why expanding from Finland to the U.S. was essential for raising venture capital.

speaking balance: gold is Josh, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · Josh 48.6% · guest 51.4%0:00 · Josh 48.6% · guest 51.4%3:00 · Josh 12.5% · guest 87.5%3:00 · Josh 12.5% · guest 87.5%6:00 · Josh 3.5% · guest 96.5%6:00 · Josh 3.5% · guest 96.5%9:00 · Josh 21.1% · guest 78.9%9:00 · Josh 21.1% · guest 78.9%12:00 · Josh 2.5% · guest 97.5%12:00 · Josh 2.5% · guest 97.5%15:00 · Josh 22.6% · guest 77.4%15:00 · Josh 22.6% · guest 77.4%18:00 · Josh 9.1% · guest 90.9%18:00 · Josh 9.1% · guest 90.9%21:00 · Josh 23.4% · guest 76.6%21:00 · Josh 23.4% · guest 76.6%24:00 · Josh 57.5% · guest 42.5%24:00 · Josh 57.5% · guest 42.5%27:00 · Josh 63.8% · guest 36.2%27:00 · Josh 63.8% · guest 36.2%30:00 · Josh 100% · guest 0%30:00 · Josh 100% · guest 0%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 12:22 Valuation defense pushback

Topias refuses to back down when Michael points out he doubled his valuation since April, insisting the company was undervalued in the prior round and could have easily commanded $8M.

Hardest push from Josh ▶ 12:29 Michael calls timeout on valuation claims

Michael Hyatt completely halts Topias's attempt to spin his April round valuation, insisting that factual fundraises cannot simply be explained away.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 8:23 Unveiling the SaaS platform model

Topias reframes the entire business model for the investors by explaining how Playven functions as a comprehensive backend club management system rather than just a simple consumer booking app.

Josh holds their own ▶ 13:01 Phil Nadel's decisive pass

Phil methodically itemizes the startup's flaws—minimal $2,000 monthly revenue after two years, undefined CAC, and lack of urgency—to justify dropping out on the spot.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicJosh as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementJosh pushing backWhy
The Tennis Problem and Initial Valuation Pushback 5236 Topias introduces Playven and asks for $2 million at an $8 million valuation. Jillian immediately questions the high valuation and asks for unit economics, prompting Topias to deflect by offering an app demo.
Marketplace Demonstration and Revenue Discrepancies 6447 Investors drill into Topias's numbers after he demonstrates the app, uncovering that despite 200,000 bookings, monthly revenue is only $2,000 because most bookings are free in Finland. Michael and Howie push back on the lack of growth over two years.
The SaaS Discovery and Unit Economics Debate 7577 The investors discover Playven is also a SaaS backend for clubs, generating most of its revenue from only 24 paying facilities. Michael questions the slim margins and high CAC, but Topias forcefully disagrees, arguing that 10% is sufficient due to high organic player retention.
Valuation Scrutiny and Phil Nadel's Pass 8368 Topias reveals he raised at a $4M valuation just months earlier in April, prompting Michael and Jillian to reject his justification for doubling it to $8M. Phil Nadel passes abruptly due to lack of urgency and low revenue.
Final Investor Rejections and Pitch Departure 7258 Phil and Michael challenge the low SaaS pricing for an allegedly mission-critical tool. All remaining investors pass sequentially, with Jillian citing the push-me-pull-you dynamic of trying to be both a SaaS platform and a consumer marketplace.
Investor Post-Mortem on Focus and Valuation 6445 The investors hold a post-mortem debating Playven's addressable market and dual identity. Josh follows up with Topias, who explains why expanding from Finland to the U.S. was essential for raising venture capital.

Statements from this episode (20)

Assertion Supported
Soininen: 14,000 US tennis clubs suffer from unused capacity
“At the same time, there's 14,000 tennis clubs in the U.S. That have a lot of unused capacity.”
Topias Soininen Mar 3, 2025 ▶ 2:15
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Playven has processed almost 200,000 bookings across 180 clubs
“We've already processed over two, almost 200,000 bookings. We, ah, at 180 tennis clubs.”
Topias Soininen Mar 3, 2025 ▶ 2:33
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Soininen: Playven generates only $2,000 a month in revenue
“Revenue we're making about 2000 bucks a month right now.”
Topias Soininen Mar 3, 2025 ▶ 4:50
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Playven spent zero dollars on user acquisition through May
“So up until May of this year, we haven't spent any money on user acquisition.”
Topias Soininen Mar 3, 2025 ▶ 10:21
Insight
Hyatt: Low-gross-margin businesses struggle to achieve net profitability
“It's very hard to invest in a company that can't show a big gross margin, because it's very hard to ever get to a net margin.”
Michael Hyatt Mar 3, 2025 ▶ 10:37
Opinion
Hyatt: Playven's 10% take rate is probably not enough to scale
“The reason it's very very expensive, is that 10% gets eaten very quickly on customer acquisition cost, your marketing costs, you're getting in the players. So the 10% isn't probably enough to scale. You have to go through a lot of cash.”
Michael Hyatt Mar 3, 2025 ▶ 11:08
Disclosure
Playven raised a $450K bridge round at a $4M valuation
“The latest we raised is like a 450,000 bridging round at a four million dollar valuation.”
Topias Soininen Mar 3, 2025 ▶ 12:05
What-if
Soininen: Playven could have raised its bridge round at $8M
“We could have, ah, gone to them at eight and we probably should have, ah, we like.”
Topias Soininen Mar 3, 2025 ▶ 12:48
Opinion
Manus: Playven's revenue does not justify an $8M valuation
“No, you shouldn't have because your revenue and this does not, ah, represent an eight million dollar valuation.”
Jillian Manus Mar 3, 2025 ▶ 12:53
Disclosure
Phil Nadel passes on Playven, citing founder's lack of urgency
“There's a lack of urgency that I'm not, as an investor, comfortable with, so I'm going to pass.”
Phil Nadel Mar 3, 2025 ▶ 13:26
Assertion Supported
Soininen: Playven is a full club management system unlike ClassPass
“We're a full-on club management system for tennis and sports clubs, where you manage space bookings, lessons in clinics, coaches so it's a completely different product on the backend side compared to ClassPass.”
Topias Soininen Mar 3, 2025 ▶ 14:07
Opinion
Hyatt: Playven has to be a marketplace to work
“It has to be a marketplace for this to work.”
Michael Hyatt Mar 3, 2025 ▶ 15:25
Opinion
Diamond: Playven cannot successfully do both SaaS and a marketplace
“You're doing two things, and I don't think you can do both.”
Howie Diamond Mar 3, 2025 ▶ 16:02
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Soininen: No HotelTonight or OpenTable for sports exists globally
“In the world, like there isn't anything like hotel tonight or open table for sports that doesn't exist anywhere in the world, really.”
Topias Soininen Mar 3, 2025 ▶ 18:00
What-if
Manus would invest in Playven at a $4M to $4.5M valuation
“If this was at four million, I would definitely come into this, or 4.5.”
Jillian Manus Mar 3, 2025 ▶ 20:14
Insight
Hyatt: Potential means nothing if founders cannot crystallize their value
“For the listeners, I think what they have to see in this one is that you can come in here with tremendous potential in a business, but if you can't crystallize the value of your business to investors, it doesn't work.”
Michael Hyatt Mar 3, 2025 ▶ 20:53
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Nadel: Playven only has 24 paying clubs after years of operating
“He's been doing this for a few years. He only has 24 clubs paying him.”
Phil Nadel Mar 3, 2025 ▶ 21:18
Opinion
Manus: Topias Soininen lacks capacity to build a cross-sport platform
“But also, I don't think he has the capacity to build out a platform for all sports across, right, all venues.”
Jillian Manus Mar 3, 2025 ▶ 22:20
Prediction Didn’t hold up
Soininen expects to raise at a valuation above $4M in the fall
“I think you know, we, I believe we can raise money at a bigger valuation than four at this point. We just, you know, need to clarify that focus a little bit and that's what we're doing. So I think, you know, once we show that we'll be able to raise at a bigger…”
Topias Soininen Mar 3, 2025 ▶ 23:19
Opinion
Soininen: Sports court booking can reach venture scale like OpenTable
“I completely disagree with that. A great example of this is, is open table. They started off as a booking system and then they become this billionaire billion dollar platform for a marketplace for finding a restaurant. So I completely disagree with that.”
Topias Soininen Mar 3, 2025 ▶ 24:31
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 100 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.