Mar 3, 2025 · 30m · the-pitch
#44 Is This Sports App the Next OpenTable?
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
Finnish founder Topias Soininen pitches Playven, a recreational tennis booking and club management platform, seeking a two-million-dollar investment on The Pitch. The investor panel ultimately passes on the deal due to concerns over an unjustified eight-million-dollar valuation, minimal revenue, and strategic confusion between its B2B SaaS and B2C marketplace models.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Josh holds 26.9% of the talking time here. How this is scored →
speaking balance: gold is Josh, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
Topias refuses to back down when Michael points out he doubled his valuation since April, insisting the company was undervalued in the prior round and could have easily commanded $8M.
Hardest push from Josh ▶ 12:29 Michael calls timeout on valuation claimsMichael Hyatt completely halts Topias's attempt to spin his April round valuation, insisting that factual fundraises cannot simply be explained away.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 8:23 Unveiling the SaaS platform modelTopias reframes the entire business model for the investors by explaining how Playven functions as a comprehensive backend club management system rather than just a simple consumer booking app.
Josh holds their own ▶ 13:01 Phil Nadel's decisive passPhil methodically itemizes the startup's flaws—minimal $2,000 monthly revenue after two years, undefined CAC, and lack of urgency—to justify dropping out on the spot.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | Josh as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | Josh pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Tennis Problem and Initial Valuation Pushback | 5 | 2 | 3 | 6 | Topias introduces Playven and asks for $2 million at an $8 million valuation. Jillian immediately questions the high valuation and asks for unit economics, prompting Topias to deflect by offering an app demo. | |
| Marketplace Demonstration and Revenue Discrepancies | 6 | 4 | 4 | 7 | Investors drill into Topias's numbers after he demonstrates the app, uncovering that despite 200,000 bookings, monthly revenue is only $2,000 because most bookings are free in Finland. Michael and Howie push back on the lack of growth over two years. | |
| The SaaS Discovery and Unit Economics Debate | 7 | 5 | 7 | 7 | The investors discover Playven is also a SaaS backend for clubs, generating most of its revenue from only 24 paying facilities. Michael questions the slim margins and high CAC, but Topias forcefully disagrees, arguing that 10% is sufficient due to high organic player retention. | |
| Valuation Scrutiny and Phil Nadel's Pass | 8 | 3 | 6 | 8 | Topias reveals he raised at a $4M valuation just months earlier in April, prompting Michael and Jillian to reject his justification for doubling it to $8M. Phil Nadel passes abruptly due to lack of urgency and low revenue. | |
| Final Investor Rejections and Pitch Departure | 7 | 2 | 5 | 8 | Phil and Michael challenge the low SaaS pricing for an allegedly mission-critical tool. All remaining investors pass sequentially, with Jillian citing the push-me-pull-you dynamic of trying to be both a SaaS platform and a consumer marketplace. | |
| Investor Post-Mortem on Focus and Valuation | 6 | 4 | 4 | 5 | The investors hold a post-mortem debating Playven's addressable market and dual identity. Josh follows up with Topias, who explains why expanding from Finland to the U.S. was essential for raising venture capital. |