The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

JJ Englert no published score: no usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
2exchanges match
0on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered produced feed D 5 · C 5 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.60

Q being a technical founder and using no code tools to build a platform. Um, tell me about that. So when you, when you listed on micro acquire, how was buyers, you know, initial reaction to your product being on no code, as opposed to, you know, something custom or built on some fancy technology. Did you have any buyers showing hesitation or was it a benefit, um, from buyers? Yeah.

A You know, I think it depends on the price too, right? Like this was a lower price startup, you know, the MRR was pretty low and comparatively. So it's not like a multimillion dollar startup where maybe they would have vetted that tech a little bit more, but really the folks that I was talking to, and I talked to a lot of folks over like two to three months, uh, probably like 50 to 60. And then I went Pretty far into due diligence with like three or four before I ended up eventually finding the, the buyer. Um, and it was really just about the business. The technology wasn't the biggest thing. Um, you know, I, I had to first, once I sold them on the business, then I was like, all right, no, tell me about the tech. Can this scale? What does this look like? What is maintaining this look like? Uh, and they quickly learned that actually, uh, it's, it's advantageous to build on no code in many ways, especially in these early days, because the cost to maintain it is lower. The ability to ship is faster, and that gives you the ability to move quicker and to adjust to your customer's needs faster, which helps you find that product market fit faster, and it also makes you, makes it so that you could fail faster, and it doesn't cost you as much. So in those early stages, I'm just a huge fan of no code, especially to just get out there fast, see what's working, iterate fast, and then beyond…

AI assessment note: “they quickly learned that actually, uh, it's, it's advantageous to build on no code”

Answered produced feed D 5 · C 5 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.60

Q really just kind of like shows the power of, of no code, if you will. So I guess my next question would be, um, how did you, um, you know, land on, on the final buyer? What was, uh, did you guys just kind of kick it off? Did they offer the highest price? Was it to make sure of both? Um, how did, how did that all come together?

A Yeah. So I went through a couple of buyers. Uh, the first one was my first forte. I didn't really know what to expect. He offered the LOI. I accepted. And then we go out into due diligence and they eventually found another product that fit them better. Uh, and then the second one, uh, I received an LOI and she seemed pretty serious. We got on a phone call. I walked her through everything and I could just tell that she just Was it really fit to like really keep this going? And I, and I was important for me to find someone that could keep it going because I put a lot of sweat equity into this, right? Like I want to see it succeed. It's not just a payday. The amount that I sold it for, it's not that much, right? It's more about, you know, making right for my users and making sure that everything keeps going. And so when I eventually found this buyer, I wanted to make sure that they also had enough resources to continue marketing and continue investing in it. And what I was selling it for wasn't going to deplete All of their assets.

AI assessment note: “when I eventually found this buyer, I wanted to make sure that they also had”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 100 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.