The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 6 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Walk: Homebrew gives carried interest to every employee at the firm
“We've always given anybody who works for homebrew carry in the fund. So our head of ops, you know, executive assistant, our head of talent in addition to getting salaries and bonuses, they are, they get unbounded upside. In our success.”
Walk: Homebrew IV invests assuming it will only write one check
“When we write a check into a company as homebrew four we hope to have the opportunity to continue to support or, you know, put more capital in if it makes sense, but we make it, we write that check, assuming It'll be the only check we write and that the juice …”
Walk: Homebrew had extreme LP concentration in its first two funds
“We went from four LPs in our first one that made up, like, 90% to eight in the second one that made up about, like, 97%”
Walk: Homebrew targets 10-12 annual seed investments of $100k-$500k
“We're going to keep our firm together. We're going to make the same number of investments each year, 10 to 12. But instead of having an ownership target that forces a certain check size, so, and so forth, we're going to write most checks between a hundred K an…”
Hunter Walk: Homebrew's first two funds achieved over 120% capital recycling
“Our first two funds, I think are all maybe are a hundred north of a 120% recycling. So we really double triple down recycling as people, you know, I was using the example before of you draw down fees, right. But you have to invest the whole amount recycling is…”