The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 5 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Randle: Gross margins are below 70% for 99% of AI app companies
“The M is almost definitively lower for, I think, 99% of AI app companies, it's lower than 70%.”
Randle: Dedicated SaaS funds face a tough strategic position in AI
“It would kind of suck to be like the SAS fund right now, you know? And I know a lot of people that are, you know, that have kind of been the SAS fund have like reinvented themselves and been like, oh, we're now like the SAS AI fund. But that's just a much toug…”
Randle: Model commoditization will not kill OpenAI because users love ChatGPT
“I don't think it's like a death knell for them because, you know, it's like, again, like most of the users of ChatGPT would use ChatGPT whether or not it was a GPT model in there or not. Like they like the product.”
Randle: Gemini leads multimodal AI while Claude and GPT-5 lead coding
“The models at any given point are good at different things, and so Gemini is like the best multimodal model. You know, Claude typically has the best coding model, although now a lot of people think GPT-Five. Is actually better than the latest Opus model at cod…”
Randle: Andreessen Horowitz and General Catalyst are asset managers, not VC firms
“But I think a lot of these firms, they have just become alternative asset managers. And like, that is what they are. And they have venture products, but they are not venture capital firms. And that's, that, that's not me being like, oh, they're not VC firms be…”