Sep 11, 2025 · 25m · sourcery

Quantum’s SpaceX Moment? Ashlee Vance on PsiQuantum’s Moonshot · Sourcery with Molly O'Shea

Ashlee Vance · 11m spoken Pete Shadbolt · 7m spoken Molly O'Shea · 3m spoken
0:00 / 0:00
▶ Watch on YouTube →

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

Host Molly O'Shea speaks with tech journalist Ashlee Vance and PsiQuantum co-founder Pete Shadbolt about the realities of building scalable quantum computers, tracing PsiQuantum's ambitious one-million-qubit moonshot and the rigorous engineering required for deep-tech commercialization.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Molly holds 14.9% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

Molly as informed peer 1.9 Guest teaching 3.0 Guest disagreement 1.1 Molly pushing back 0.3
05100:0010:0020:000:53–3:11 · Molly as informed peer 3/10 Evolution and Current State of Quantum Computing Molly demonstrates good background preparation by citing Ashlee's reporting on D-Wave dating back to 2007. Ashlee educates the room on the evolution of quantum from academic science experiments producing single qubits to a messy startup landscape with competing architectures.3:11–6:17 · Molly as informed peer 2/10 PsiQuantum’s Strategy and One Million Qubit Target Molly asks open-ended questions about PsiQuantum's differentiation and Ashlee's facility tour takeaways. Ashlee clearly breaks down the technical reality of error correction, explaining why achieving one million physical qubits is necessary to yield roughly one thousand logical qubits.6:17–10:29 · Molly as informed peer 1/10 Sponsor Segment: Brex Financial Stack for Startups Following an ad read, Molly asks Pete why he chose to collaborate closely with Ashlee. Pete explains that he values Ashlee's DARPA-style skepticism toward quantum hype rather than blind cheerleading.10:29–13:24 · Molly as informed peer 1/10 Academic Mindsets vs. Commercial Execution in Deep Tech Ashlee delivers an extended critique of academic founders, arguing that their pursuit of engineering perfection often hinders building commercial startup products. The host listens as Ashlee contrasts academic culture with Silicon Valley commercial execution.13:24–15:35 · Molly as informed peer 1/10 Finding the "Mad Scientist" Office Backdrop Molly asks a casual, conversational question about the video set used in Ashlee's documentary. Ashlee humorously describes sourcing a chaotic, authentic office belonging to a former Xerox PARC engineer through a post on X.15:35–20:07 · Molly as informed peer 2/10 Sponsor Segment: Turing Enterprise AI Systems Following the Turing sponsor read, Molly asks Pete how he sustains team motivation over decade-long timelines. Pete draws a vivid parallel to Apollo 11 and explains how an uncompromising focus on full fault-tolerance attracts top-tier talent.20:07–25:15 · Molly as informed peer 3/10 The "Always Be Impressive" Ethos and 10-Year Hardware Cycles Molly steers the conversation by reminding Pete of his management mantra 'Always be impressive.' Ashlee and Pete reject the myth of overnight software success, explaining that deep-tech hardware breakthroughs like SpaceX typically require 10 to 12 grueling years of capital and survival.0:53–3:11 · Guest teaching 4/10 Evolution and Current State of Quantum Computing Molly demonstrates good background preparation by citing Ashlee's reporting on D-Wave dating back to 2007. Ashlee educates the room on the evolution of quantum from academic science experiments producing single qubits to a messy startup landscape with competing architectures.3:11–6:17 · Guest teaching 5/10 PsiQuantum’s Strategy and One Million Qubit Target Molly asks open-ended questions about PsiQuantum's differentiation and Ashlee's facility tour takeaways. Ashlee clearly breaks down the technical reality of error correction, explaining why achieving one million physical qubits is necessary to yield roughly one thousand logical qubits.6:17–10:29 · Guest teaching 1/10 Sponsor Segment: Brex Financial Stack for Startups Following an ad read, Molly asks Pete why he chose to collaborate closely with Ashlee. Pete explains that he values Ashlee's DARPA-style skepticism toward quantum hype rather than blind cheerleading.10:29–13:24 · Guest teaching 4/10 Academic Mindsets vs. Commercial Execution in Deep Tech Ashlee delivers an extended critique of academic founders, arguing that their pursuit of engineering perfection often hinders building commercial startup products. The host listens as Ashlee contrasts academic culture with Silicon Valley commercial execution.13:24–15:35 · Guest teaching 0/10 Finding the "Mad Scientist" Office Backdrop Molly asks a casual, conversational question about the video set used in Ashlee's documentary. Ashlee humorously describes sourcing a chaotic, authentic office belonging to a former Xerox PARC engineer through a post on X.15:35–20:07 · Guest teaching 3/10 Sponsor Segment: Turing Enterprise AI Systems Following the Turing sponsor read, Molly asks Pete how he sustains team motivation over decade-long timelines. Pete draws a vivid parallel to Apollo 11 and explains how an uncompromising focus on full fault-tolerance attracts top-tier talent.20:07–25:15 · Guest teaching 4/10 The "Always Be Impressive" Ethos and 10-Year Hardware Cycles Molly steers the conversation by reminding Pete of his management mantra 'Always be impressive.' Ashlee and Pete reject the myth of overnight software success, explaining that deep-tech hardware breakthroughs like SpaceX typically require 10 to 12 grueling years of capital and survival.0:53–3:11 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Evolution and Current State of Quantum Computing Molly demonstrates good background preparation by citing Ashlee's reporting on D-Wave dating back to 2007. Ashlee educates the room on the evolution of quantum from academic science experiments producing single qubits to a messy startup landscape with competing architectures.3:11–6:17 · Guest disagreement 0/10 PsiQuantum’s Strategy and One Million Qubit Target Molly asks open-ended questions about PsiQuantum's differentiation and Ashlee's facility tour takeaways. Ashlee clearly breaks down the technical reality of error correction, explaining why achieving one million physical qubits is necessary to yield roughly one thousand logical qubits.6:17–10:29 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Sponsor Segment: Brex Financial Stack for Startups Following an ad read, Molly asks Pete why he chose to collaborate closely with Ashlee. Pete explains that he values Ashlee's DARPA-style skepticism toward quantum hype rather than blind cheerleading.10:29–13:24 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Academic Mindsets vs. Commercial Execution in Deep Tech Ashlee delivers an extended critique of academic founders, arguing that their pursuit of engineering perfection often hinders building commercial startup products. The host listens as Ashlee contrasts academic culture with Silicon Valley commercial execution.13:24–15:35 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Finding the "Mad Scientist" Office Backdrop Molly asks a casual, conversational question about the video set used in Ashlee's documentary. Ashlee humorously describes sourcing a chaotic, authentic office belonging to a former Xerox PARC engineer through a post on X.15:35–20:07 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Sponsor Segment: Turing Enterprise AI Systems Following the Turing sponsor read, Molly asks Pete how he sustains team motivation over decade-long timelines. Pete draws a vivid parallel to Apollo 11 and explains how an uncompromising focus on full fault-tolerance attracts top-tier talent.20:07–25:15 · Guest disagreement 2/10 The "Always Be Impressive" Ethos and 10-Year Hardware Cycles Molly steers the conversation by reminding Pete of his management mantra 'Always be impressive.' Ashlee and Pete reject the myth of overnight software success, explaining that deep-tech hardware breakthroughs like SpaceX typically require 10 to 12 grueling years of capital and survival.0:53–3:11 · Molly pushing back 1/10 Evolution and Current State of Quantum Computing Molly demonstrates good background preparation by citing Ashlee's reporting on D-Wave dating back to 2007. Ashlee educates the room on the evolution of quantum from academic science experiments producing single qubits to a messy startup landscape with competing architectures.3:11–6:17 · Molly pushing back 0/10 PsiQuantum’s Strategy and One Million Qubit Target Molly asks open-ended questions about PsiQuantum's differentiation and Ashlee's facility tour takeaways. Ashlee clearly breaks down the technical reality of error correction, explaining why achieving one million physical qubits is necessary to yield roughly one thousand logical qubits.6:17–10:29 · Molly pushing back 0/10 Sponsor Segment: Brex Financial Stack for Startups Following an ad read, Molly asks Pete why he chose to collaborate closely with Ashlee. Pete explains that he values Ashlee's DARPA-style skepticism toward quantum hype rather than blind cheerleading.10:29–13:24 · Molly pushing back 0/10 Academic Mindsets vs. Commercial Execution in Deep Tech Ashlee delivers an extended critique of academic founders, arguing that their pursuit of engineering perfection often hinders building commercial startup products. The host listens as Ashlee contrasts academic culture with Silicon Valley commercial execution.13:24–15:35 · Molly pushing back 0/10 Finding the "Mad Scientist" Office Backdrop Molly asks a casual, conversational question about the video set used in Ashlee's documentary. Ashlee humorously describes sourcing a chaotic, authentic office belonging to a former Xerox PARC engineer through a post on X.15:35–20:07 · Molly pushing back 0/10 Sponsor Segment: Turing Enterprise AI Systems Following the Turing sponsor read, Molly asks Pete how he sustains team motivation over decade-long timelines. Pete draws a vivid parallel to Apollo 11 and explains how an uncompromising focus on full fault-tolerance attracts top-tier talent.20:07–25:15 · Molly pushing back 1/10 The "Always Be Impressive" Ethos and 10-Year Hardware Cycles Molly steers the conversation by reminding Pete of his management mantra 'Always be impressive.' Ashlee and Pete reject the myth of overnight software success, explaining that deep-tech hardware breakthroughs like SpaceX typically require 10 to 12 grueling years of capital and survival.

speaking balance: gold is Molly, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · Molly 16.8% · guest 83.2%0:00 · Molly 16.8% · guest 83.2%3:00 · Molly 4.9% · guest 95.1%3:00 · Molly 4.9% · guest 95.1%6:00 · Molly 43.8% · guest 56.2%6:00 · Molly 43.8% · guest 56.2%9:00 · Molly 0% · guest 100%9:00 · Molly 0% · guest 100%12:00 · Molly 5.8% · guest 94.2%12:00 · Molly 5.8% · guest 94.2%15:00 · Molly 31.7% · guest 68.3%15:00 · Molly 31.7% · guest 68.3%18:00 · Molly 7.6% · guest 92.4%18:00 · Molly 7.6% · guest 92.4%21:00 · Molly 0% · guest 100%21:00 · Molly 0% · guest 100%24:00 · Molly 33.5% · guest 66.5%24:00 · Molly 33.5% · guest 66.5%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 10:20 Ashlee dismisses academic founders' business acumen

Ashlee bluntly argues that academics are generally bad at starting businesses because they get trapped in endless perfectionism instead of building shipping products.

Hardest push from Molly ▶ 20:01 Molly reminds Pete of his own core management principle

When Pete draws a blank on his own management philosophy, Molly steps in and directly challenges him to address his 'Always be impressive' rule.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 3:30 Ashlee breaks down the million-qubit error correction requirement

Ashlee explains the complex software error-correction overhead that makes small qubit milestones practically useless without reaching a million physical qubits.

Molly holds their own ▶ 0:52 Molly cites Ashlee's early D-Wave coverage from 2007

Molly establishes research credibility by referencing Ashlee's earliest reporting on D-Wave from 2007 to frame the discussion on quantum evolution.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicMolly as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementMolly pushing backWhy
Evolution and Current State of Quantum Computing 3411 Molly demonstrates good background preparation by citing Ashlee's reporting on D-Wave dating back to 2007. Ashlee educates the room on the evolution of quantum from academic science experiments producing single qubits to a messy startup landscape with competing architectures.
PsiQuantum’s Strategy and One Million Qubit Target 2500 Molly asks open-ended questions about PsiQuantum's differentiation and Ashlee's facility tour takeaways. Ashlee clearly breaks down the technical reality of error correction, explaining why achieving one million physical qubits is necessary to yield roughly one thousand logical qubits.
Sponsor Segment: Brex Financial Stack for Startups 1110 Following an ad read, Molly asks Pete why he chose to collaborate closely with Ashlee. Pete explains that he values Ashlee's DARPA-style skepticism toward quantum hype rather than blind cheerleading.
Academic Mindsets vs. Commercial Execution in Deep Tech 1430 Ashlee delivers an extended critique of academic founders, arguing that their pursuit of engineering perfection often hinders building commercial startup products. The host listens as Ashlee contrasts academic culture with Silicon Valley commercial execution.
Finding the "Mad Scientist" Office Backdrop 1000 Molly asks a casual, conversational question about the video set used in Ashlee's documentary. Ashlee humorously describes sourcing a chaotic, authentic office belonging to a former Xerox PARC engineer through a post on X.
Sponsor Segment: Turing Enterprise AI Systems 2310 Following the Turing sponsor read, Molly asks Pete how he sustains team motivation over decade-long timelines. Pete draws a vivid parallel to Apollo 11 and explains how an uncompromising focus on full fault-tolerance attracts top-tier talent.
The "Always Be Impressive" Ethos and 10-Year Hardware Cycles 3421 Molly steers the conversation by reminding Pete of his management mantra 'Always be impressive.' Ashlee and Pete reject the myth of overnight software success, explaining that deep-tech hardware breakthroughs like SpaceX typically require 10 to 12 grueling years of capital and survival.

Statements from this episode (5)

Assertion Not checkable as stated
Vance: Fabricating qubits is now something almost every quantum startup can do
“Now it seems like just about everybody can, Make cubits. They can make quite a few of them.”
Ashlee Vance Sep 11, 2025 ▶ 2:02
Assertion Supported
Vance: One million physical qubits yield roughly one thousand useful logical qubits
“There's this weird thing with quantum computing where you have to use all these funky software techniques to do this error correction stuff, and so if you have a million qubits, it comes down to about, like, A thousand are really, really useful for what you're…”
Ashlee Vance Sep 11, 2025 ▶ 3:54
Opinion
Pete Shadbolt: Quantum computing has repeatedly failed to deliver on its promises
“Quantum computing is a pain in the ass. And it is, you know, failed promises and endless confusion and all of this competitive jostling and it's a pain in the ass and it's like failed to deliver many, many times.”
Pete Shadbolt Sep 11, 2025 ▶ 7:41
Insight
Shadbolt: Quantum Founders Cannot Win by Mudslinging Rival Architectures
“In quantum computing, you get all of these founders, they all show up and they all think that their way is the only way to do it and sling mud at everybody else. Everything else is crap. Like, you can't win that game. Like, nobody wins in that game.”
Pete Shadbolt Sep 11, 2025 ▶ 20:35
Insight
Ashlee Vance: Worthwhile Hardware Breakthroughs Require 10 to 12 Years
“It seems like all the really good, the biggest things I've ever covered, they all take 10 to 12 years. I think Silicon Valley, sometimes you have this overnight sensation kind of thing where you see Steve Jobs or Mark Zuckerberg turn up when they're 26 and the…”
Ashlee Vance Sep 11, 2025 ▶ 22:55
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 160 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.