The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 4 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Dines: Trying to Create a Software Category Is a Sign of Arrogance
“I don't think that the desire to make a Category is the right approach to build software. I think it's a sign of arrogance. I want to build a new category. It's I think it's gonna clutter your mind if you feel, it's, you feel too much, you put too much pressur…”
Dines: Software customers do not care about architectural purity
“Customers don't care about purity. This is also another lesson, guys. It's you, if you aim to purity, it's the wrong way to do. It's you need to aim for kind of something that is, I mean, it's like life. Purity in a way burns everything around it, and you don'…”
Dines: Hiring expert A-players without chemistry is a recipe for disaster
“My biggest learning in hiring, you should go for chemistry versus expertise. I was always under impression that you, if you can assemble a team of A players, highly experts in their domain, this is gonna work. It is far away from working. This is a recipe for …”