The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 6 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Bryk: Exa applies OpenAI's o1 variable compute paradigm to web search
“One way of thinking about what we built is like O-one for search because, Oh, one is all about like, you know, some questions require more compute than others, and we'll put as much compute into the question as we need to solve it. So similarly with our search…”
Exa.ai uses LLMs as data labelers instead of humans
“We could get by, which we are right now doing, using, like, LLMs as the labelers.”
Bryk: Exa's initial foundation model predicted documents rather than raw URLs
“The link refers here to a document. It's not, I think one confusing thing is it's not, you're not actually predicting the URL itself. That would require like the system to have memorized URLs. You're actually like getting the actual document. A more accurate n…”
Exa runs core search subsystems with one or two people each
“And so it's like the crawling system, the AI processing system, and then the serving system. Those are all like, you know, teams of like hundreds, maybe thousands of people at Google. But for us, it's like one or two people each typically, but”