why aren't all 18 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 4 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Lambert: Hybrid reasoners may be phased out except for niche uses
“I think in plenty of ways, like hybrid reasoners might just be aged out except for niche applications because quality is so much more important than having a hundred X less inference tokens. It's like you just pay for it and compute and that'll get better.”
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Major Foundation Model Companies Will Train on AI2's Vision Data
“The things that this model is good at are things that all the foundation companies, like they're just going to take our data and train on it.”
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Lambert: Open source will learn to train models on arbitrary preference data
“I really think people in open source and academics are going to figure out how to use any preference data on any model just because they're scrappy.”
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Lambert: OpenAI Will Not Aggressively Ban Synthetic Training Scraping
“I don't expect OpenAI to go too crazy on this, because they're just gonna, there's gonna be so much backlash against them.”
Prediction Open · timeframe Jul 2028
Lambert: LMSYS is probably setting up a deep research arena
“I mean, they're probably setting up a deep research arena, because that's the data that, I mean, if I was open AI working on deep research, that's the data that I want, and there are competitors, and LMSYS is the entity that has the market placement to set it …”
Prediction Open · timeframe Jul 2030
Lambert: All major frontier AI labs will build their own search indexes
“I think they'll all do end up doing their own index and it should, it's one of those things that's like Google should have an advantage again, but who knows if they do.”
Prediction Open · timeframe Jul 2028
Lambert: Academics cannot match industry compute on Humanity's Last Exam
“I just think it's kind of unlikely that we're going to win as a academic and a state of the art number because they're going to start spending millions of tokens per query. And it's just a lot of, it's a lot of compute burn. Like the getting, beating that on t…”
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Lambert: OpenAI's open model will be best-in-class in its size category
“I expected. It'll be best in class for some size Category in some subset of tasks. That's like, OpenAI only does things like that.”
Prediction Open · timeframe Jul 2028
Lambert: Jony Ive and OpenAI hardware will run in the cloud
“I think that thing will run on the cloud. I don't think that'll run local anyways.”
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Lambert: Open community will eventually match OpenAI's large-scale RL infrastructure
“And this is something that these early relative models are not going to be doing because we don't like, no one has this infrastructure like open AI does. It'll take a while to do that, but people will make it.”
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Lambert: Open judge models will become core open RL infrastructure
“We already have a bunch of open models that are doing like judge of models and Prometheus and other things that are designed specifically for LM as a judge. And I see that continuing to just become part of this kind of open RL infrastructure.”
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Nathan Lambert: RL will remain a distinct field from language modeling
“I think in the long run it will still settle out, or RL will still be a field that people work on just because of these kind of fundamental things that I talked about, that it's just viewing the whole problem formulation different than predicting text, really,…”
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Lambert: AI community will clarify if chain-of-thought maps to RL within a year
“I think in the next year that'll probably get kind of made more concrete by the community on, like, if you can easily draw out, like, if chain of thought reasoning is more like RL.”
Prediction Held up
Lambert: Practitioners Will Adopt Constitutional AI for Preferences in 2024
“I think in twenty-twenty-four at some point people will start doing things like constitutional AI for preferences.”
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Lambert: Offline RL could take off due to simpler training pipelines
“There's a few papers that people have published
Not a lot of traction.
I think it could take off.
Some people that I know in the RLHF area really think a lot of people are doing this in industry just because it makes the kind of training process simpler and th…”
Prediction Held up
Lambert: More DPO models will emerge than any other method
“I expect to see more DPO models than anything else in the next six months.”
Prediction Held up
Lambert: Labs will surely use parallel-compute models to generate synthetic data
“Well, I bet people, I mean, they surely will use these for synthetic data. It's just like the marginal gain on synthetic data is always very high.”
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Lambert: RL feedback mechanisms will specialize across distinct task domains
“It seems very likely that different feedback will be used for different domains.
Chain of thought reasoning is great.
For math, and that's where these process reward models are being designed.
Probably not great for things like poetry, but as any tool gets bet…”