The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 3 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Yang: Models should pass completion benchmarks before expensive multi-turn agentic evals
“Like, you know, you can do well on those first, and then sort of graduate to the multi-turn expensive stuff.”
Yang: TerminalBench enables more creative eval design than SWE-bench
“As we bench, you're confined in some sense to the domain of issues and PRs that already exist which I think has its benefits of being close to reality and natural, but I think with Terminal Bench, there's a lot of creativity that you can infuse into that”
Yang: Evaluating Human-AI Code Interaction Requires Compelling Products or Simulators
“From an academic standpoint, it feels like there's two difficult approaches to resolving that. Either you build, like, a really compelling product, like Elmarina, that people have people use consistently, which is, I mean, really tricky in and of itself. Or yo…”