The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 1 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Eysenbach: 1,000-layer RL requires reward-free objectives, not just architectural tricks
“I think the main conclusion is that using big networks not only requires these architectural tricks, but also, as Kevin mentioned before, it requires using a different objective. This objective doesn't actually use rewards in it, and so there's another word in…”