The Ledger

Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.

2statements match

2resolved → 0open claims → 2supported → 0contradicted →

why aren't all 2 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable

Assertion Supported

Eysenbach: Scaling RL depth requires combining depth with residual connections

“And if we just made the depth bigger, it makes it worse. If we just add residual connections, it didn't make it better. And it was really this combination of factors that Kevin and Ishan figured out that really made this work.”

Benjamin Eysenbach Dec 31, 2025 ▶ 5:56 [NeurIPS Best Paper] 1000 Layer Networks for Self-Supervised RL — Kevin Wang et al, Princeton

Assertion Supported

Eysenbach: Historically, 'deep' RL meant only two to four layers

“So it's like, probably my lab works on deep reinforcement learning, but historically deep meant like two or three or four layers.”

Benjamin Eysenbach Dec 31, 2025 ▶ 2:15 [NeurIPS Best Paper] 1000 Layer Networks for Self-Supervised RL — Kevin Wang et al, Princeton

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 200 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.

The Ledger

Turn any episode into a week of clips.