The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 6 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Gur-Ari: Augment Code Achieved #1 on SWE-Bench Verified
“We just made number one on Sweepbench. So for us Sweepbench has been a useful tool for exploring how can we get the most out of agents. And so we were able to get the best result on Sweepbench verified right now.”
Cosine's Genie achieved a state-of-the-art 43.8% on SWE-bench Verified
“We got 219 out of 500, which is 43.8%, which is To my knowledge, at least right now, state of the art also”
Watkins: About 90% of SWE-bench Verified tasks take under an hour
“For Sweep Edge Verified I think that's something like, 90% of the problems are things that were estimated to take, like, an expert software engineer like, less than an hour.”
Merrill: 60% to 70% of SWE-bench Verified tasks come from Django
“If you go look at sweet bench verified, I think like 60, 70% of the tasks in there are from Django.”
Watkins: OpenAI hired nearly 100 engineers to curate 500 SWE-bench tasks
“So folks at OpenAI did a pretty extensive human data campaign, hiring like almost a hundred real-world software engineers to go through the problems and figure out, like, are the tasks well-specified? Are the tests actually fair and kind of created a curated s…”