The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 4 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Shah: OpenClaw's 15-message replay fails prompt caching and costs 10x more
“The way OpenClaw does it is it essentially sends back the last 15 messages in the conversation and it essentially uses that back and forth. And I mean, the approach itself is not ideal because you will, like, you are not doing any, like, you're not utilizing a…”
Shah: Supermemory outperformed Claude Code and OpenClaw benchmarks by almost 50%
“So the Claude code one performed the worst, and OpenClaw slightly more than that, and SuperMemory is the highest, and you can see that, you know, it's like a pretty significant difference, like almost 50%.”
Shah: No other memory provider offers hybrid memory and raw RAG fallback
“Essentially, you will return the memories first, and then if there's any raw chunks that match up, we also return those to make sure the agent knows just enough information to answer the question. And no other provider does this right now”
Shah: Supermemory dynamically injects under 2,000 tokens via deterministic hooks
“So we basically turned the tools based approach to hooks based approach that actually is dealing from the super memory graph, which keeps the content fresh. So it handles updates, et cetera. So now, you know, for every tool call or for every user message, a ho…”