The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 2 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Morcos: Qwen is much easier to align than Llama due to pre-training
“It's much easier to RL Quen than it is to do Lama. Likely that has to do with the fact that Quen put a lot of synthetic reasoning traces into their training data.”
Soldani: Llama and Qwen models fail OSI open source AI definition
“Under this definition, for example, Lama or some of the Quen models are not open source because the license says you can, you can't use this model for this, or it says if you use this model, you have to name the output this way or derivative needs to be named …”