The Ledger

Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.

clear all ✕

why aren't all 3 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable

Assertion Supported
White: Co-Scientist uses LLM ranking while Robin filters with data and literature
“In co-scientists, their filtration process was other LLMs sort of ranking it with rubrics or like personas. And our filtration process was like literature search and data analysis.”
Andrew White Jan 28, 2026 ▶ 26:58 🔬 From Red Teaming GPT-4 to Automating Drug Discovery: The Future of AI in Science — Andrew White
Assertion Supported
White: Human expert hypothesis rankings failed to predict wet-lab success
“And one of the things that came out of the Robin paper is that the hypothesis that people thought was best was not the one that led to success in that paper.”
Andrew White Jan 28, 2026 ▶ 23:18 🔬 From Red Teaming GPT-4 to Automating Drug Discovery: The Future of AI in Science — Andrew White
Assertion Supported
White: PaperQA outputs page citations for every generated sentence
“Paper QA was has, like, every sentence that it outputs has a citation to a page, right?”
Andrew White Jan 28, 2026 ▶ 26:03 🔬 From Red Teaming GPT-4 to Automating Drug Discovery: The Future of AI in Science — Andrew White
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 200 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.