The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 3 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Pullen: CoScene's Genie outperforms OpenAI o1 out of the box on SWE-bench
“So it was obviously great to see, like, we still are better than O-one out of the box. You know, even with an older model, and I'm sure that that, that Delta will continue to grow once we're able to train O-one and once we've done more work on our dataset usin…”
Pullen: SWE-bench is a poor proxy for real-world AI coding competence
“I know Sweebench is, like, the most commonly talked about thing, and honestly, it's a very, it's an amazing project, but one of the things we've learned the most from actually shipping this product to users is, it's a pretty bad proxy at telling us how compete…”
Pullen: Replacing Genie's reasoning traces with o1 traces improves performance
“Even now we've started Replacing some of the reasoning traces in our Genie model with reasoning traces generated by O-one, or at least in tandem with O-one, and we've already started seeing improvements in performance from that point.”