The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 2 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Mohan: Enterprises should fine-tune off-the-shelf models over custom architectures
“For a vast majority of enterprises, they should probably be using something off the shelf, fine tuning BERT models. If it's a vision, they should be fine tuning resonant or using something like clip, like the less work they can do the better.”
Robicheaux: CLIP encoders lack fine-grained visual features due to caption-matching objective
“Models that have been initialized with Clip as their vision encoder, they don't have fine-grained details and the features extracted using Clip because Clip sort of doesn't need to find these fine grade details to do its job correctly, which is just to match c…”