The Ledger

Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.

2statements match

0resolved → 0open claims → 0supported → 0contradicted →

why aren't all 2 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable

Assertion Not checkable as stated

Hou: Users choose SWE-1 at higher frequencies than Claude 3.7 and 3.5

“People are choosing SWE-ONE because it recognizes how they do work, not necessarily how to generate code. And it's contributing, actually, an even higher frequency than models like 3.7 and 3.5.”

Kevin Hou Jul 28, 2025 ▶ 3:31:45 🕰️ The Oral History of Windsurf (ft. Varun Mohan, Scott Wu, Jeff Wang, Kevin Hou, Anshul R)

Assertion Not checkable as stated

Claude 3.7 performed worse than Claude 3.5 on Convex evals

“For example, we just tried clod three seven and it performs worse than clod three five on convex evals with the same prompting.”

Sujay Jayakar Mar 19, 2025 ▶ 17:23 Fullstack-Bench: The Eval for Coding Agents — with Sujay Jayakar, Chief Scientist, Convex

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 200 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.

The Ledger

Turn any episode into a week of clips.