The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 4 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Polu: Fully autonomous AI models 'get lost' and are not ready
“The AutoGPD approach, obviously, is extremely exciting, but we know that the agentic capability of models are not quite there yet. It just gets lost.”
Polu: Hierarchies of simple agents will unlock Auto-GPT level value
“Once you have those working really well, you can create meta agents that use the agents as actions, and all of a sudden you can kind of have a hierarchy of responsibility that will probably get you almost to the point of the auto GPT value.”
Shah: Early frameworks like AutoGPT assumed model reasoning that didn't exist
“So if you look at the first Implementation of like agent frameworks. You look at you know, baby AJI and auto GBT. I think it was an auto gen. That's the Microsoft one. They were way ahead of their time because they assumed this level of reasoning and execution…”