“False positives are terrible for human scientists, right? Because you go to try something. It doesn't work for the model. It's fantastic. It reduces uncertainty a lot. For the operator, it's kind of a bummer, right? Because you thought you were going to get something cool.”
quote is from the automated transcript, cleaned for reading:
filler sounds and stutters are removed, nothing is rephrased. names can be misheard
(the analysis reads context, assessments check outside sources). how →
More from Rafa Gomez-Bombarelli
Opinion
Gomez-Bombarelli: Pure language representation is not required for scientific superintelligence
“I don't think it's necessary. I don't think that's a necessary condition for a scientific super intelligence.”
Rafa Gomez-BombarelliJul 16, 2026▶ 33:21🔬 RL with Verifiable Rewards, but the Verifier is a Lab — Lila Sciences
AssertionNot checkable as stated
Gomez-Bombarelli: Small-Molecule Drug Discovery Training Transferred to Metal-Organic Frameworks
“And it turns out that our models had been trained on small molecule drug discovery, and all of the chemistry that they had learned thinking about drug discovery carried over to start reasoning over this metal organic framework materials that we can use to take…”
Rafa Gomez-BombarelliJul 16, 2026▶ 39:53🔬 RL with Verifiable Rewards, but the Verifier is a Lab — Lila Sciences
Opinion
Gomez-Bombarelli: Meta's virtual materials datasets fail to solve real-world chemistry
“Meta has produced tens of millions, hundreds of millions of training data points, but they're all virtual simulations that just don't carry enough water for the thing we actually want to do.”
Rafa Gomez-BombarelliJul 16, 2026▶ 1:37:52🔬 RL with Verifiable Rewards, but the Verifier is a Lab — Lila Sciences
Opinion
Gomez-Bombarelli: AI Must Solve Real Material Science Beyond Simulation
“But it was clear that we needed to bridge a gap and get this thing all the way out and make, do AI for actual material science and not just the computational version.”
Rafa Gomez-BombarelliJul 16, 2026▶ 5:10🔬 RL with Verifiable Rewards, but the Verifier is a Lab — Lila Sciences
AssertionNot checkable as stated
Gomez-Bombarelli: Lila tests 96 MOFs in an hour using proxy measurements
“And that's something we built in the lab now where instead of measuring pressure, we're measuring another property we care about that is a readout for what actually pressure will tell us, but we can do 96 well plates for 96 metal organic frameworks in like an …”
Rafa Gomez-BombarelliJul 16, 2026▶ 1:12:46🔬 RL with Verifiable Rewards, but the Verifier is a Lab — Lila Sciences
AssertionNot checkable as stated
Gomez-Bombarelli: Modern lab benchtop instruments match decade-old government beamlines
“The instruments we have now are as powerful as a beam line would have been 10 years ago. We're taking measurements today that 10 years ago would have requested you to ask the federal government for a Time slot at two in the morning, somewhere out there you kno…”
Rafa Gomez-BombarelliJul 16, 2026▶ 1:17:14🔬 RL with Verifiable Rewards, but the Verifier is a Lab — Lila Sciences
Made with StarZero
Turn any episode into a week of clips.
This entire site, over 200 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable,
runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the
moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.
We use essential cookies to make the site work. With your permission we
also use analytics cookies (Google Analytics and Mixpanel) to understand
usage and improve StarZero. See our Cookie Policy.