Jun 30, 2026 · 1h 48m · latent-space

🔬 "The Most Innovative Diffusion Research Is Happening in Drug Discovery, Not Image Generation"

Evan Feinberg · 59m spoken Sergei Yudinov · 17m spoken Brandon Anderson · 12m spoken RJ Haneke · 10m spoken
0:00 / 0:00
▶ Watch on YouTube →

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

In this episode of the Latent Space AI for Science podcast, Genesis Molecular AI leaders Evan Feinberg and Sergei Yudinov discuss how frontier 3D diffusion models, synthetic physics data, and sub-angstrom precision are transforming small-molecule drug discovery and multi-parameter optimization.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. How this is scored →

The hosts as informed peer 6.3 Guest teaching 4.4 Guest disagreement 1.8 The hosts pushing back 2.2
05100:0020:0040:001:00:001:20:001:40:003:34–7:17 · The hosts as informed peer 6/10 The Evolution of AI in Molecular Biology and Drug Discovery Brandon frames the decade-long arc of machine learning in molecular biology and zeroes in on the historically resistant problem of protein-small molecule interactions. Evan enthusiastically agrees and elaborates on the iterative compounding nature of AI in drug discovery.7:18–11:38 · The hosts as informed peer 6/10 Fundamentals of Drug Discovery & the 3D Structure Hypothesis Brandon asks about historical failure modes and computational expense in 3D structure prediction. Evan explains lock-and-key biology and how testing the 3D coordinate hypothesis historically required cost-prohibitive crystallographic experiments.11:38–16:41 · The hosts as informed peer 6/10 Introducing Pearl: 3D Co-Folding and Synthetic Physics Data Hosts and guests discuss co-folding models like Pearl, AlphaFold 3, and OpenFold. Sergei and Evan explain why small molecules present a 10^60 search space and how physics-based synthetic data augments the sparse PDB database.16:42–20:26 · The hosts as informed peer 7/10 Scaling Laws and Inference-Time Reasoning for Structure Prediction Sergei connects LLM inference-time reasoning to crystal structure diffusion heads, while RJ drills into the iterative steering loop, mechanistic interpretability, and loop transformers.20:27–25:05 · The hosts as informed peer 6/10 Incorporating Physical Priors and Focusing on Small Molecules Evan discusses representation learning, physical priors, and why AlphaFold-predicted structures historically failed in docking force fields due to low pocket resolution.25:06–32:18 · The hosts as informed peer 6/10 High-Leverage Intervention Points in the Drug Development Pipeline RJ prompts a walkthrough of the drug development lifecycle, and Evan argues that hit-to-lead and target drug design are the highest-leverage intervention points for AI.32:19–35:33 · The hosts as informed peer 7/10 First-in-Class vs. Best-in-Class Targets and Industry Partnerships Brandon challenges whether known-biology targets have already been picked over. Evan counters that biology validation is orthogonal to druggability and cites ALK inhibitor generational progress.35:34–41:41 · The hosts as informed peer 6/10 Beyond Static Structures: ADMET Properties and Multi-Parameter Optimization Sergei and Brandon debunk the popular notion that Nobel-winning structure prediction solved drug discovery, stressing ADMET and off-target selectivity. Evan shares progress on partner programs.41:42–46:35 · The hosts as informed peer 7/10 The Sub-Angstrom Resolution Imperative and Metric Evals Brandon challenges whether static poses are an artificial abstraction rather than probability distributions. Sergei and Evan defend rigid poses as necessary for docking verification and explain sub-angstrom thresholds.46:36–52:10 · The hosts as informed peer 6/10 Agentic Chemistry (Sapphire) and Sub-Angstrom Precision Evan details how poor 1.9 Angstrom RMSD predictions yield agentic slop and explains hydrogen bonding geometry tolerances (0.6 Angstrom margin), introducing the Sapphire agentic platform.52:11–58:11 · The hosts as informed peer 7/10 Achieving 1-Angstrom Precision & The Eval Evolution Sergei breaks down the eval-centric engineering approach. Evan compares misleading 2-Angstrom metrics to SWE-bench discrepancies and cites PoseBusters as a necessary eval evolution.58:11–1:04:22 · The hosts as informed peer 7/10 The Evolution of Machine Learning for ADME Prediction Brandon asks about the history of graph neural networks and ADMET prediction. Evan discusses PotentialNet, MoleculeNet, and predicting multi-parameter endpoints like hERG channel inhibition.1:04:22–1:10:41 · The hosts as informed peer 6/10 The Convergence of Diffusion Models in Structural Biology Evan reviews the transition from GAN mode collapse to 3D diffusion models, noting that the most innovative diffusion research is currently happening in molecular co-folding.1:10:42–1:22:53 · The hosts as informed peer 6/10 Wet-Lab Integration, Automation Realities, and RL Feedback Loops Evan pushes back hard against overhyped claims of fully robotic automated labs, explaining chemical purification, NMR verification, low high-throughput screening R-squared, and anti-correlating molecular properties.1:22:54–1:37:35 · The hosts as informed peer 7/10 Company Strategy: Genesis Molecular AI and Human-Agent Symbiosis RJ and Brandon explore the company's rebrand and strategic shift toward agents. Sergei explains why LLM agents allow med chemists to orchestrate complex tools without manual hyperparameter tuning.1:37:35–1:42:17 · The hosts as informed peer 6/10 Outperforming Benchmarks on the OpenBind EV-A71 Protease Challenge Sergei and Evan review Pearl's performance on the OpenBind EV-A71 protease challenge, specifically highlighting its ability to model dynamic flexible loop movements and induced-fit binding.1:42:18–1:48:32 · The hosts as informed peer 6/10 Industry Bottlenecks, Compute Scarcity, and the Future of AI for Science Sergei calls out LLM architectures as comparatively boring transformer layers from 2017 and flags GPU compute bottlenecks, while Evan suggests that alpha in generic LLMs is peaking relative to life sciences.3:34–7:17 · Guest teaching 3/10 The Evolution of AI in Molecular Biology and Drug Discovery Brandon frames the decade-long arc of machine learning in molecular biology and zeroes in on the historically resistant problem of protein-small molecule interactions. Evan enthusiastically agrees and elaborates on the iterative compounding nature of AI in drug discovery.7:18–11:38 · Guest teaching 4/10 Fundamentals of Drug Discovery & the 3D Structure Hypothesis Brandon asks about historical failure modes and computational expense in 3D structure prediction. Evan explains lock-and-key biology and how testing the 3D coordinate hypothesis historically required cost-prohibitive crystallographic experiments.11:38–16:41 · Guest teaching 5/10 Introducing Pearl: 3D Co-Folding and Synthetic Physics Data Hosts and guests discuss co-folding models like Pearl, AlphaFold 3, and OpenFold. Sergei and Evan explain why small molecules present a 10^60 search space and how physics-based synthetic data augments the sparse PDB database.16:42–20:26 · Guest teaching 4/10 Scaling Laws and Inference-Time Reasoning for Structure Prediction Sergei connects LLM inference-time reasoning to crystal structure diffusion heads, while RJ drills into the iterative steering loop, mechanistic interpretability, and loop transformers.20:27–25:05 · Guest teaching 5/10 Incorporating Physical Priors and Focusing on Small Molecules Evan discusses representation learning, physical priors, and why AlphaFold-predicted structures historically failed in docking force fields due to low pocket resolution.25:06–32:18 · Guest teaching 4/10 High-Leverage Intervention Points in the Drug Development Pipeline RJ prompts a walkthrough of the drug development lifecycle, and Evan argues that hit-to-lead and target drug design are the highest-leverage intervention points for AI.32:19–35:33 · Guest teaching 4/10 First-in-Class vs. Best-in-Class Targets and Industry Partnerships Brandon challenges whether known-biology targets have already been picked over. Evan counters that biology validation is orthogonal to druggability and cites ALK inhibitor generational progress.35:34–41:41 · Guest teaching 4/10 Beyond Static Structures: ADMET Properties and Multi-Parameter Optimization Sergei and Brandon debunk the popular notion that Nobel-winning structure prediction solved drug discovery, stressing ADMET and off-target selectivity. Evan shares progress on partner programs.41:42–46:35 · Guest teaching 5/10 The Sub-Angstrom Resolution Imperative and Metric Evals Brandon challenges whether static poses are an artificial abstraction rather than probability distributions. Sergei and Evan defend rigid poses as necessary for docking verification and explain sub-angstrom thresholds.46:36–52:10 · Guest teaching 6/10 Agentic Chemistry (Sapphire) and Sub-Angstrom Precision Evan details how poor 1.9 Angstrom RMSD predictions yield agentic slop and explains hydrogen bonding geometry tolerances (0.6 Angstrom margin), introducing the Sapphire agentic platform.52:11–58:11 · Guest teaching 5/10 Achieving 1-Angstrom Precision & The Eval Evolution Sergei breaks down the eval-centric engineering approach. Evan compares misleading 2-Angstrom metrics to SWE-bench discrepancies and cites PoseBusters as a necessary eval evolution.58:11–1:04:22 · Guest teaching 4/10 The Evolution of Machine Learning for ADME Prediction Brandon asks about the history of graph neural networks and ADMET prediction. Evan discusses PotentialNet, MoleculeNet, and predicting multi-parameter endpoints like hERG channel inhibition.1:04:22–1:10:41 · Guest teaching 4/10 The Convergence of Diffusion Models in Structural Biology Evan reviews the transition from GAN mode collapse to 3D diffusion models, noting that the most innovative diffusion research is currently happening in molecular co-folding.1:10:42–1:22:53 · Guest teaching 6/10 Wet-Lab Integration, Automation Realities, and RL Feedback Loops Evan pushes back hard against overhyped claims of fully robotic automated labs, explaining chemical purification, NMR verification, low high-throughput screening R-squared, and anti-correlating molecular properties.1:22:54–1:37:35 · Guest teaching 4/10 Company Strategy: Genesis Molecular AI and Human-Agent Symbiosis RJ and Brandon explore the company's rebrand and strategic shift toward agents. Sergei explains why LLM agents allow med chemists to orchestrate complex tools without manual hyperparameter tuning.1:37:35–1:42:17 · Guest teaching 4/10 Outperforming Benchmarks on the OpenBind EV-A71 Protease Challenge Sergei and Evan review Pearl's performance on the OpenBind EV-A71 protease challenge, specifically highlighting its ability to model dynamic flexible loop movements and induced-fit binding.1:42:18–1:48:32 · Guest teaching 4/10 Industry Bottlenecks, Compute Scarcity, and the Future of AI for Science Sergei calls out LLM architectures as comparatively boring transformer layers from 2017 and flags GPU compute bottlenecks, while Evan suggests that alpha in generic LLMs is peaking relative to life sciences.3:34–7:17 · Guest disagreement 1/10 The Evolution of AI in Molecular Biology and Drug Discovery Brandon frames the decade-long arc of machine learning in molecular biology and zeroes in on the historically resistant problem of protein-small molecule interactions. Evan enthusiastically agrees and elaborates on the iterative compounding nature of AI in drug discovery.7:18–11:38 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Fundamentals of Drug Discovery & the 3D Structure Hypothesis Brandon asks about historical failure modes and computational expense in 3D structure prediction. Evan explains lock-and-key biology and how testing the 3D coordinate hypothesis historically required cost-prohibitive crystallographic experiments.11:38–16:41 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Introducing Pearl: 3D Co-Folding and Synthetic Physics Data Hosts and guests discuss co-folding models like Pearl, AlphaFold 3, and OpenFold. Sergei and Evan explain why small molecules present a 10^60 search space and how physics-based synthetic data augments the sparse PDB database.16:42–20:26 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Scaling Laws and Inference-Time Reasoning for Structure Prediction Sergei connects LLM inference-time reasoning to crystal structure diffusion heads, while RJ drills into the iterative steering loop, mechanistic interpretability, and loop transformers.20:27–25:05 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Incorporating Physical Priors and Focusing on Small Molecules Evan discusses representation learning, physical priors, and why AlphaFold-predicted structures historically failed in docking force fields due to low pocket resolution.25:06–32:18 · Guest disagreement 2/10 High-Leverage Intervention Points in the Drug Development Pipeline RJ prompts a walkthrough of the drug development lifecycle, and Evan argues that hit-to-lead and target drug design are the highest-leverage intervention points for AI.32:19–35:33 · Guest disagreement 2/10 First-in-Class vs. Best-in-Class Targets and Industry Partnerships Brandon challenges whether known-biology targets have already been picked over. Evan counters that biology validation is orthogonal to druggability and cites ALK inhibitor generational progress.35:34–41:41 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Beyond Static Structures: ADMET Properties and Multi-Parameter Optimization Sergei and Brandon debunk the popular notion that Nobel-winning structure prediction solved drug discovery, stressing ADMET and off-target selectivity. Evan shares progress on partner programs.41:42–46:35 · Guest disagreement 2/10 The Sub-Angstrom Resolution Imperative and Metric Evals Brandon challenges whether static poses are an artificial abstraction rather than probability distributions. Sergei and Evan defend rigid poses as necessary for docking verification and explain sub-angstrom thresholds.46:36–52:10 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Agentic Chemistry (Sapphire) and Sub-Angstrom Precision Evan details how poor 1.9 Angstrom RMSD predictions yield agentic slop and explains hydrogen bonding geometry tolerances (0.6 Angstrom margin), introducing the Sapphire agentic platform.52:11–58:11 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Achieving 1-Angstrom Precision & The Eval Evolution Sergei breaks down the eval-centric engineering approach. Evan compares misleading 2-Angstrom metrics to SWE-bench discrepancies and cites PoseBusters as a necessary eval evolution.58:11–1:04:22 · Guest disagreement 1/10 The Evolution of Machine Learning for ADME Prediction Brandon asks about the history of graph neural networks and ADMET prediction. Evan discusses PotentialNet, MoleculeNet, and predicting multi-parameter endpoints like hERG channel inhibition.1:04:22–1:10:41 · Guest disagreement 1/10 The Convergence of Diffusion Models in Structural Biology Evan reviews the transition from GAN mode collapse to 3D diffusion models, noting that the most innovative diffusion research is currently happening in molecular co-folding.1:10:42–1:22:53 · Guest disagreement 4/10 Wet-Lab Integration, Automation Realities, and RL Feedback Loops Evan pushes back hard against overhyped claims of fully robotic automated labs, explaining chemical purification, NMR verification, low high-throughput screening R-squared, and anti-correlating molecular properties.1:22:54–1:37:35 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Company Strategy: Genesis Molecular AI and Human-Agent Symbiosis RJ and Brandon explore the company's rebrand and strategic shift toward agents. Sergei explains why LLM agents allow med chemists to orchestrate complex tools without manual hyperparameter tuning.1:37:35–1:42:17 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Outperforming Benchmarks on the OpenBind EV-A71 Protease Challenge Sergei and Evan review Pearl's performance on the OpenBind EV-A71 protease challenge, specifically highlighting its ability to model dynamic flexible loop movements and induced-fit binding.1:42:18–1:48:32 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Industry Bottlenecks, Compute Scarcity, and the Future of AI for Science Sergei calls out LLM architectures as comparatively boring transformer layers from 2017 and flags GPU compute bottlenecks, while Evan suggests that alpha in generic LLMs is peaking relative to life sciences.3:34–7:17 · The hosts pushing back 1/10 The Evolution of AI in Molecular Biology and Drug Discovery Brandon frames the decade-long arc of machine learning in molecular biology and zeroes in on the historically resistant problem of protein-small molecule interactions. Evan enthusiastically agrees and elaborates on the iterative compounding nature of AI in drug discovery.7:18–11:38 · The hosts pushing back 2/10 Fundamentals of Drug Discovery & the 3D Structure Hypothesis Brandon asks about historical failure modes and computational expense in 3D structure prediction. Evan explains lock-and-key biology and how testing the 3D coordinate hypothesis historically required cost-prohibitive crystallographic experiments.11:38–16:41 · The hosts pushing back 2/10 Introducing Pearl: 3D Co-Folding and Synthetic Physics Data Hosts and guests discuss co-folding models like Pearl, AlphaFold 3, and OpenFold. Sergei and Evan explain why small molecules present a 10^60 search space and how physics-based synthetic data augments the sparse PDB database.16:42–20:26 · The hosts pushing back 3/10 Scaling Laws and Inference-Time Reasoning for Structure Prediction Sergei connects LLM inference-time reasoning to crystal structure diffusion heads, while RJ drills into the iterative steering loop, mechanistic interpretability, and loop transformers.20:27–25:05 · The hosts pushing back 1/10 Incorporating Physical Priors and Focusing on Small Molecules Evan discusses representation learning, physical priors, and why AlphaFold-predicted structures historically failed in docking force fields due to low pocket resolution.25:06–32:18 · The hosts pushing back 2/10 High-Leverage Intervention Points in the Drug Development Pipeline RJ prompts a walkthrough of the drug development lifecycle, and Evan argues that hit-to-lead and target drug design are the highest-leverage intervention points for AI.32:19–35:33 · The hosts pushing back 3/10 First-in-Class vs. Best-in-Class Targets and Industry Partnerships Brandon challenges whether known-biology targets have already been picked over. Evan counters that biology validation is orthogonal to druggability and cites ALK inhibitor generational progress.35:34–41:41 · The hosts pushing back 2/10 Beyond Static Structures: ADMET Properties and Multi-Parameter Optimization Sergei and Brandon debunk the popular notion that Nobel-winning structure prediction solved drug discovery, stressing ADMET and off-target selectivity. Evan shares progress on partner programs.41:42–46:35 · The hosts pushing back 4/10 The Sub-Angstrom Resolution Imperative and Metric Evals Brandon challenges whether static poses are an artificial abstraction rather than probability distributions. Sergei and Evan defend rigid poses as necessary for docking verification and explain sub-angstrom thresholds.46:36–52:10 · The hosts pushing back 2/10 Agentic Chemistry (Sapphire) and Sub-Angstrom Precision Evan details how poor 1.9 Angstrom RMSD predictions yield agentic slop and explains hydrogen bonding geometry tolerances (0.6 Angstrom margin), introducing the Sapphire agentic platform.52:11–58:11 · The hosts pushing back 3/10 Achieving 1-Angstrom Precision & The Eval Evolution Sergei breaks down the eval-centric engineering approach. Evan compares misleading 2-Angstrom metrics to SWE-bench discrepancies and cites PoseBusters as a necessary eval evolution.58:11–1:04:22 · The hosts pushing back 2/10 The Evolution of Machine Learning for ADME Prediction Brandon asks about the history of graph neural networks and ADMET prediction. Evan discusses PotentialNet, MoleculeNet, and predicting multi-parameter endpoints like hERG channel inhibition.1:04:22–1:10:41 · The hosts pushing back 1/10 The Convergence of Diffusion Models in Structural Biology Evan reviews the transition from GAN mode collapse to 3D diffusion models, noting that the most innovative diffusion research is currently happening in molecular co-folding.1:10:42–1:22:53 · The hosts pushing back 3/10 Wet-Lab Integration, Automation Realities, and RL Feedback Loops Evan pushes back hard against overhyped claims of fully robotic automated labs, explaining chemical purification, NMR verification, low high-throughput screening R-squared, and anti-correlating molecular properties.1:22:54–1:37:35 · The hosts pushing back 3/10 Company Strategy: Genesis Molecular AI and Human-Agent Symbiosis RJ and Brandon explore the company's rebrand and strategic shift toward agents. Sergei explains why LLM agents allow med chemists to orchestrate complex tools without manual hyperparameter tuning.1:37:35–1:42:17 · The hosts pushing back 2/10 Outperforming Benchmarks on the OpenBind EV-A71 Protease Challenge Sergei and Evan review Pearl's performance on the OpenBind EV-A71 protease challenge, specifically highlighting its ability to model dynamic flexible loop movements and induced-fit binding.1:42:18–1:48:32 · The hosts pushing back 2/10 Industry Bottlenecks, Compute Scarcity, and the Future of AI for Science Sergei calls out LLM architectures as comparatively boring transformer layers from 2017 and flags GPU compute bottlenecks, while Evan suggests that alpha in generic LLMs is peaking relative to life sciences.

speaking balance: gold is the hosts, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%0:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%3:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%3:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%6:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%6:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%9:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%9:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%12:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%12:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%15:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%15:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%18:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%18:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%21:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%21:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%24:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%24:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%27:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%27:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%30:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%30:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%33:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%33:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%36:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%36:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%39:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%39:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%42:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%42:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%45:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%45:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%48:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%48:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%51:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%51:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%54:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%54:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%57:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%57:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:00:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:00:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:03:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:03:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:06:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:06:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:09:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:09:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:12:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:12:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:15:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:15:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:18:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:18:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:21:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:21:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:24:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:24:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:27:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:27:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:30:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:30:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:33:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:33:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:36:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:36:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:39:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:39:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:42:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:42:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:45:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:45:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:48:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%1:48:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 1:18:00 Pushback on automated robotic chemistry hype

Evan forcefully rejects the industry narrative that automated cloud labs have solved wet-lab bottlenecks, pointing out abysmal correlation rates and synthetic purification challenges.

Hardest push from the hosts ▶ 44:21 Challenging the physical reality of static binding poses

Brandon directly challenges whether a static 3D pose is an artificial human abstraction rather than a thermodynamic probability ensemble.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 50:20 The 0.6-angstrom physics of hydrogen bonding

Evan gives a detailed physics breakdown of hydrogen bonding donor-acceptor distances, demonstrating why predictions above 1 Angstrom produce unusable slop.

The host holds their own ▶ 18:18 Host drilling into diffusion steering and verification loops

RJ demonstrates strong technical fluency by dissecting how inference-time reasoning maps to diffusion verifiers and loop transformers.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicThe hosts as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementThe hosts pushing backWhy
The Evolution of AI in Molecular Biology and Drug Discovery 6311 Brandon frames the decade-long arc of machine learning in molecular biology and zeroes in on the historically resistant problem of protein-small molecule interactions. Evan enthusiastically agrees and elaborates on the iterative compounding nature of AI in drug discovery.
Fundamentals of Drug Discovery & the 3D Structure Hypothesis 6412 Brandon asks about historical failure modes and computational expense in 3D structure prediction. Evan explains lock-and-key biology and how testing the 3D coordinate hypothesis historically required cost-prohibitive crystallographic experiments.
Introducing Pearl: 3D Co-Folding and Synthetic Physics Data 6512 Hosts and guests discuss co-folding models like Pearl, AlphaFold 3, and OpenFold. Sergei and Evan explain why small molecules present a 10^60 search space and how physics-based synthetic data augments the sparse PDB database.
Scaling Laws and Inference-Time Reasoning for Structure Prediction 7413 Sergei connects LLM inference-time reasoning to crystal structure diffusion heads, while RJ drills into the iterative steering loop, mechanistic interpretability, and loop transformers.
Incorporating Physical Priors and Focusing on Small Molecules 6521 Evan discusses representation learning, physical priors, and why AlphaFold-predicted structures historically failed in docking force fields due to low pocket resolution.
High-Leverage Intervention Points in the Drug Development Pipeline 6422 RJ prompts a walkthrough of the drug development lifecycle, and Evan argues that hit-to-lead and target drug design are the highest-leverage intervention points for AI.
First-in-Class vs. Best-in-Class Targets and Industry Partnerships 7423 Brandon challenges whether known-biology targets have already been picked over. Evan counters that biology validation is orthogonal to druggability and cites ALK inhibitor generational progress.
Beyond Static Structures: ADMET Properties and Multi-Parameter Optimization 6422 Sergei and Brandon debunk the popular notion that Nobel-winning structure prediction solved drug discovery, stressing ADMET and off-target selectivity. Evan shares progress on partner programs.
The Sub-Angstrom Resolution Imperative and Metric Evals 7524 Brandon challenges whether static poses are an artificial abstraction rather than probability distributions. Sergei and Evan defend rigid poses as necessary for docking verification and explain sub-angstrom thresholds.
Agentic Chemistry (Sapphire) and Sub-Angstrom Precision 6632 Evan details how poor 1.9 Angstrom RMSD predictions yield agentic slop and explains hydrogen bonding geometry tolerances (0.6 Angstrom margin), introducing the Sapphire agentic platform.
Achieving 1-Angstrom Precision & The Eval Evolution 7523 Sergei breaks down the eval-centric engineering approach. Evan compares misleading 2-Angstrom metrics to SWE-bench discrepancies and cites PoseBusters as a necessary eval evolution.
The Evolution of Machine Learning for ADME Prediction 7412 Brandon asks about the history of graph neural networks and ADMET prediction. Evan discusses PotentialNet, MoleculeNet, and predicting multi-parameter endpoints like hERG channel inhibition.
The Convergence of Diffusion Models in Structural Biology 6411 Evan reviews the transition from GAN mode collapse to 3D diffusion models, noting that the most innovative diffusion research is currently happening in molecular co-folding.
Wet-Lab Integration, Automation Realities, and RL Feedback Loops 6643 Evan pushes back hard against overhyped claims of fully robotic automated labs, explaining chemical purification, NMR verification, low high-throughput screening R-squared, and anti-correlating molecular properties.
Company Strategy: Genesis Molecular AI and Human-Agent Symbiosis 7423 RJ and Brandon explore the company's rebrand and strategic shift toward agents. Sergei explains why LLM agents allow med chemists to orchestrate complex tools without manual hyperparameter tuning.
Outperforming Benchmarks on the OpenBind EV-A71 Protease Challenge 6412 Sergei and Evan review Pearl's performance on the OpenBind EV-A71 protease challenge, specifically highlighting its ability to model dynamic flexible loop movements and induced-fit binding.
Industry Bottlenecks, Compute Scarcity, and the Future of AI for Science 6432 Sergei calls out LLM architectures as comparatively boring transformer layers from 2017 and flags GPU compute bottlenecks, while Evan suggests that alpha in generic LLMs is peaking relative to life sciences.

Statements from this episode (24)

Assertion Supported
Feinberg: Solving experimental 3D protein structures takes months and tens of thousands
“Like you might as well solve the three D crystal structure or cryo-EM structure is what you're saying, which can cost tens of thousands of dollars. It can be months or years. Right. Entire PhD theses, postdocs can sometimes work literally 24 seven trying to so…”
Evan Feinberg Jun 30, 2026 ▶ 10:22
Assertion Supported
Edunov: There are 10^60 drug-like small molecules in the universe
“There are 10 to the 60 drug-like small molecules in the universe.”
Sergei Yudinov Jun 30, 2026 ▶ 13:57
Assertion Supported
Edunov: The Protein Data Bank contains around 200,000 crystal structures
“So a lot of training data that people are used is so-called PDB which is a public database of like all of the historical Crystal structures, and it's not that big. It's like 200,000 crystal structures, and it's very hard to expand.”
Sergei Yudinov Jun 30, 2026 ▶ 15:20
Insight
Edunov: Small molecules can be modeled with physics to generate training data
“In small molecular space, you can actually model your small molecules with physics. You can model their behavior, and that allows you to create more data that you can train model on. Something which is not necessarily possible in protein to protein.”
Sergei Yudinov Jun 30, 2026 ▶ 15:50
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Edunov: Physics-guided inference-time scaling significantly boosts molecular model performance
“We are doing very similar thing with our models where a model is forced to think, except it's not thinking in language tokens. It's thinking in terms of crystal structures, not fully materialized crystal structures, but some sort of a crystal structure represe…”
Sergei Yudinov Jun 30, 2026 ▶ 17:47
Assertion Supported
Feinberg: Genesis CTO Sergey Edunov led Meta's Llama 2 research team
“Sergei led the LLAMA II research team at Meta when he was still there.”
Evan Feinberg Jun 30, 2026 ▶ 20:36
Assertion Supported
Feinberg: Small molecules make up 65% of FDA-approved drugs
“Small molecules are still 65% of FDA approved drugs, so we're talking about the biggest part of the pie.”
Evan Feinberg Jun 30, 2026 ▶ 23:35
Assertion Supported
Feinberg: Studies show AlphaFold structures provided no value for drug docking
“There is this, ah, a few papers that came out, one was in Cell, I think last year, which showed that for all of the claims about AlphaFold-solving drug discovery, people try to take AlphaFold-produced protein structures, use them for traditional docking, and f…”
Evan Feinberg Jun 30, 2026 ▶ 24:24
Opinion
Feinberg: Drug discovery and design is AI's highest-leverage application in healthcare
“Our contention is that the highest leverage application of artificial intelligence Is the drug discovery and drug design process.”
Evan Feinberg Jun 30, 2026 ▶ 27:36
Insight
Feinberg: Biological target validation is orthogonal to druggability
“Known biology is orthogonal to the ease with which one can drug that target. Sometimes, unfortunately, it seems they anti-correlate in that often it seems that the most appealing targets from a validation perspective seem to be really hard to drug.”
Evan Feinberg Jun 30, 2026 ▶ 32:45
Insight
Edunov: Predicting ADMET properties is as critical as protein structure prediction
“Predicting all of those properties is also just as important as, or maybe even more important than predicting the crystal structure itself.”
Sergei Yudinov Jun 30, 2026 ▶ 37:45
Insight
Edunov: Predicting molecular poses is necessary to validate drug discovery models
“Yes, it's an abstraction, but it's a very useful abstraction. It helps us to build up confidence that a particular model output is actually valid. Whether you did not just straight up hallucinate at something, because yes, ultimately what matters is binding af…”
Sergei Yudinov Jun 30, 2026 ▶ 45:18
Disclosure
Feinberg: Genesis is developing autonomous drug discovery agent platform 'Sapphire'
“We're working on an agentic platform for 24 seven drug discovery. If you can imagine just fleets of hundreds of med chemists and CAD scientists Working nights and weekends all the time for your drug targets. The code name for that gem is Sapphire.”
Evan Feinberg Jun 30, 2026 ▶ 48:21
Assertion Supported
Feinberg: Potent ligands have well-defined 3D positions down to 0.5 angstroms
“The reality is that for a highly potent ligand, Almost certainly, there is a large portion of that molecule with a very well-defined three-D position, down to even half angstrom.”
Evan Feinberg Jun 30, 2026 ▶ 49:28
Insight
Yudinov: Only data, infrastructure, and evals matter in AI development
“Where three things matter in AI it's data, infrastructure, and evals. Right. So you can only improve what you measure. And once you are very careful about measuring, What matters? And you have really talented people on the team. We're going to figure out how t…”
Sergei Yudinov Jun 30, 2026 ▶ 52:26
Opinion
Feinberg: Gemini is obviously worse at coding despite benchmark wins
“So Gemini does pretty well on Sweebench. Sometimes Gemini publishes models that win on some of those software benchmarks. Raise your hand if you're using Gemini to write code right now instead of, you know, the obvious other name competitors. No one. Like, why…”
Evan Feinberg Jun 30, 2026 ▶ 55:32
Insight
Feinberg: Drug candidates must pass over 30 distinct assay properties
“I would say there's over 30 or so assays, each of which you could imagine if you're a neural net person, like a multitask neural network or multi-head, it's got to predict over 30, you know, three dozen-ish properties, each of which, if it's in the wrong range…”
Evan Feinberg Jun 30, 2026 ▶ 1:00:36
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Feinberg: GANs failed for protein modeling due to mode collapse before diffusion emerged
“For all the same reasons that those models were really tricky to train for images. Mode collapse was the most famous sort of problem. They didn't work very well for proteins or protein ligand systems. And we sort of had to wait for the right primitive to get c…”
Evan Feinberg Jun 30, 2026 ▶ 1:07:32
Opinion
Feinberg: The most innovative diffusion research is happening in 3D structure prediction
“What's kind of cool is right now for people that are interested in really core fundamental AI research, actually some of the most innovative diffusion research is happening in our field, is happening in three D structure prediction right now.”
Evan Feinberg Jun 30, 2026 ▶ 1:07:57
Insight
Feinberg: High-throughput screening exhibits a shockingly low R-squared to actual synthesis
“The reality is that the translation of high throughput screens, whether it's Dell, DNA encoded libraries, or more traditional screens, the R-squared of those predictions to, like, the actual business of resynthesizing a molecule de novo and doing a Low through…”
Evan Feinberg Jun 30, 2026 ▶ 1:18:36
Insight
Feinberg: Robotic lab automation trades off molecule novelty and quality for speed
“The kinds of chemistries that today can be automated are fairly constrained. And so your ability to search chemical space broadly for those really top top Pareto optimal compounds is, is actually very limited. So the benefits you get in speed have a very harsh…”
Evan Feinberg Jun 30, 2026 ▶ 1:20:38
Insight
Yudinov: Crystal structures can become a native modality for LLMs
“Or you can even train a model which is able to natively understand crystal structure representation, and like image modality is a modality for LLMs these days. Crystal structure can be a modality for LLMs as well.”
Sergei Yudinov Jun 30, 2026 ▶ 1:33:12
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Feinberg: Chipmakers will invest in life sciences as LLM alpha shrinks
“I do think that chip makers, including Nvidia, are going to want to get a lot more invested in life sciences because it will always be high in demand. And The amount of alpha left in pure LLM space is just getting a little questionable.”
Evan Feinberg Jun 30, 2026 ▶ 1:44:44
Opinion
Edunov: LLM architectures are boring and fundamentally unchanged since 2017
“And honestly, LLM architectures are relatively boring. I don't know, probably alienate half of your audience. But it's like, it's a transforming layer in the end, like paper was published in 2017, and you go to any LLM lab today, you will see very, very simila…”
Sergei Yudinov Jun 30, 2026 ▶ 1:46:23
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 200 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.