The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Sheila Heen no published score: no usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
2exchanges match
0on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered produced feed D 5 · C 5 · P 5 · Cm 4 4.85

Q Um, so what'd you do your undergrad in?

A Um, I was a public policy major, which was sort of politics, philosophy, and economics. And, um, I came out of that thinking, I don't think I want to go into politics, but the understanding why people do what they do and unintended consequences was really interesting to me. So, and law school, the first year of law school is very intellectually stimulating. It's really interesting. It's very absorbing. And we had one elective and the one elective that I heard I should try to get into was negotiation. So, I was lucky enough to get into the class. I take it the spring of my first year, and I just totally fell in love. Like, immediately, I thought, I could do this every day for the rest of my life, and learn something new every day.

AI assessment note: “I was a public policy major, which was sort of politics, philosophy, and economics.”

Answered produced feed D 5 · C 5 · P 5 · Cm 4 4.85

Q What was the text they were using back then? Is that the Getting to Yes?

A Getting to Yes, and it was taught by Roger Fisher. And Roger Fisher, um, who founded the negotiation project, the Harvard Negotiation Project, and who wrote Getting to Yes, um, he fought in World War II, um, And in both the Atlantic and Pacific theaters, and when he came home from the war, he found that of the six college roommates who started college together, and at the end of that first year they stopped out, it was called, to go to war, he was the only one who came home. And it sort of motivated the rest of his life to try to find better ways to help people manage conflict. And so he was a really inspirational person, um, and a really wonderful teacher because part of his philosophy was that you, you have to walk your talk and you have to Demonstrate what you are teaching and how you teach it, because teaching itself is a negotiation. You are negotiating for people's engagement and willingness to take risks and to admit mistakes, um, and to see what they have to learn, which is not easy with Harvard Law School students, right? Like failure muscles, not so well developed in that population. Um, so owning up to screwing something up, um, Is a big negotiation right in the learning process with each other. And so he was such an amazing teacher and negotiation in itself is such an interdisciplinary field that I just felt like this touches on everything in life. And, um, I want t…

AI assessment note: “Getting to Yes, and it was taught by Roger Fisher.”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 200 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.