why aren't all 6 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Assertion Supported
Citron: GREE asked him to step aside months after OpenFeint buyout
“After like three or four months, you know, they asked me to step aside and basically like, we're going to take the business in this direction. And so I left.”
What-if
Citron: Continuing to build games would never have reached massive scale
“Like, I think we could have had a really good small to mid-sized business if we had focused on that game, but from the experience I had building Openfeint, I knew that, like, we, I had these powers that I could use to have positive impact on, like, tens or hun…”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Citron: Free-to-play rise and Apple competition squeezed OpenFeint
“Free-to-play games kind of had less of a need for Openfeint. And we were also competing with Apple, and now Google at this point.”
Assertion Supported
Citron: No Sand Hill Road VCs invested in OpenFeint
“We raised money from a couple of strategic investors, but actually no Sandhill VCs invested in that company.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Citron: OpenFeint never figured out how to make money
“Very quickly we actually realized that that was not a great business model, and so we just made it free for initially, and we never really figured out how to make money off of it, frankly.”
Assertion Supported
Citron: OpenFeint raised seed funding using a waitlist landing page
“TechCrunch covered it, and we got a couple hundred People who signed up on the mailing list. And so we actually took that mailing list and went out and raised a seed round of funding. And then we spent the next three months building and launching to launch the…”