why aren't all 6 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Disclosure
Hantas: 21 Seeds Held $4M in Funding for Only 1.5 Years Before Exit
“We didn't even keep their money for very long because the four million dollars we raised, they, we only had that money for like a year and a half, you know?”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Five major conglomerates own essentially all American whiskey brands
“You can kind of go down the list of every major American whiskey brand, and I can tell you who owns them. So like all the- ... The Diageos, the Sazeracs, LVMH, absolutely. They, you have essentially five that own everything.”
Assertion Partly supported
Five major multinational conglomerates own nearly all major American whiskey brands
“The Diageos, the Sazeracs, LVMH. Absolutely. They, you have essentially five that own Everything.”
Assertion Supported
Hantas: 21 Seeds went from retail launch to Diageo acquisition in under three years
“Like, we got on shelf in April of 2019 and we closed the deal with Diageo March of 2022.”
Assertion Partly supported
Creelman: Stirrings accelerated Diageo buyout in 2008 amid economic downturn
“What ended up happening is in 2008, the business and the partnership really kind of hadn't fulfilled the potential that we had all imagined, and there were a variety of factors for that. One was the economy changing, the other was sort of the fit between their…”
Disclosure
Creelman: Stirrings structured Diageo deal as staged equity buyout
“The plumbing was that we ultimately ended up selling them, you know, a percentage of the business with the idea that we would then exit the business to them entirely pending kind of growth and trajectory of the business.”