The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Raphael Brose no published score: no usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
0on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered produced feed D 5 · C 5 · P 5 · Cm 4 4.85

Q And that is one of the reasons engineered carbon removal is becoming more attractive for companies with aggressive targets and some extra money to invest. I sat down with Rafael at the Verge conference to talk about what the solutions mix will look like for Microsoft. Can you talk about what the engineered solutions you're identifying, currently working with, or have on the horizon are?

A Yeah, absolutely. I think the, the best known one is Direct Air Capture DAC, and I'll cover that briefly because I think it's very well covered elsewhere. Um, Companies like Climeworks, like Carbon Engineering, and Heirloom, and others are devising ways to take CO₂ directly from atmosphere, and there's a diverse set of approaches there, but basically you build a large, you know, something that we would all recognize as a big plant, a big steel-on-the-ground plant, and, you know, you capture CO₂ from the atmosphere, you concentrate it, you liquefy it, and you have a storage partner who puts it underground. There are other approaches, of course, as well, um, There are a lot of biomass-based pathways. Uh, you can call it, um, biomass with carbon removal and storage, or bioenergy with carbon capture and storage. A good example of this, uh, might be Charm Industrial here in the Bay Area that is turning, uh, crop waste in the Midwest in, uh, you know, in giant blender sort of process and injecting it underground. And that acknowledges that Uh, plants are actually very, very good at capturing carbon slowly over time, and so if we can find the waste streams in those, in those agricultural systems, and then turn that waste into carbon removal, that's a very viable strategy. I'll add a caveat, and this is one of the things that we're running into, and, um, I would say, like, my philosoph…

AI assessment note: “Companies like Climeworks, like Carbon Engineering, and Heirloom, and others are devising ways”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 100 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.