why aren't all 5 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Assertion Supported
Naam: Uber, Lyft, and WeWork burned more capital than cleantech
“If you look at, you know, some real darlings of The tech VC world, companies like Uber, or Lyft, or WeWork, you see companies that have burned through an enormous amount of capital, far more than most cleantech companies ever have or ever will.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Naam: Addressing climate change requires $100 trillion in infrastructure turnover
“Or the early stages, honestly, of a hundred trillion dollar clean energy revolution, essentially. We're going to turn over, that sounds like it's just a made-up number, but when you actually look at the infrastructure turnover we need to address climate change…”
Assertion Supported
Naam: Cleantech VC funding dropped 4x to 5x between 2008 and 2015
“We saw this retrenchment of venture capital, and maybe it peaked around 2008, something like that, and by 2015, the dollars flowing per year had dropped by a factor of four or five, and especially for the earliest stage deals.”
Assertion Supported
Naam: Steel accounts for 8% of global carbon emissions, tripling aviation
“Steel is like eight percent of global carbon emissions. It's three times aviation.”
Assertion Supported
Naam: Global cleantech spend grew from $50B in 2004 to over $500B
“If you go back, 2004, the world was spending maybe fifty billion on cleantech, very broadly defined. Now we're spending well north of five hundred billion.”