The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 3 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Elemental targets 4.2 GW nuclear capacity by 2030, 100 GW by 2040
“Our goal was to have a gigawatt under construction by twenty-thirty, 10 by 35, and a hundred gigawatts by twenty-forty. We're now looking at 4.2 gigawatts by twenty-thirty, so we've already, like, quadrupled that, or halfway there to our twenty-thirty-five goa…”
Google deal directly funds Elemental Power's upfront nuclear project development costs
“They made investment, you know, mostly in the technology, but increasingly as this deal we're doing now with Google is in the upfront development, which is really the key part that needs to be re-risked.”
Elemental Power to select winning nuclear reactor technologies within 18 months
“We're technology agnostic in the belief that, or the knowledge that we can go out and find sites that are amenable to the hyperscale is what they need for offtake and location that we can develop in a way that in a year from now or, A year and a half from now,…”