The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 4 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Quantum computing offers scientific explainability and reproducibility currently lacking in AI
“It, it's, it, a large language model and its training and inference phases are completely opaque. You can't say, why did you give me this solution versus this one? And if I just change a variable slightly, what will be the outcome? Non-reproducible results, no…”
Quantum provides massive performance gains for a narrow set of applications
“The key to quantum is incredible performance gains on a narrow class of applications, but some of those applications are really critical to a lot of industrial sectors, commercial sectors, and governments, and just about everybody, so it's more of an accelerat…”
Quantum optimization does not need perfection to create commercial value
“Optimization doesn't have to be perfect to be good. The traveling salesman problem would be a great example. If I can reduce how far that traveling salesman has to go by a little bit, On a quantum system. It may not be the best answer. It may not be the absolu…”
Quantum simulates materials directly from physics without requiring large training datasets
“Quantum is much more science-based in some sense. It doesn't require a huge corpus of information to reach its conclusions. It's based more on the physics and the science of what it means to how a material interacts. So without data, AI is basically just Kind …”